Antrim Criminal Lawyer, New Hampshire

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Laurie Lacoste
About | Practice Areas
Champions Law, PLLC
170 West Rd Suite 6D Portsmouth, NH 03801» view map
Criminal Defense
Your Advocate & Defender

When you are dealing with an important, life-altering legal issue, having the right attorney on your side can make all the difference. At Champions Law, we are here to serve you.

800-783-8020
1. Laurie Lacoste Portsmouth, NH
  Attorney at Law - NH, 2004
  Massachusetts School of Law J.D. 2003
2. AboutChampions Law, PLLC
  We are a lean, innovative firm.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Margaret Lee Leppanen

Criminal, Personal Injury, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

41 Old Sutton Rd, Bradford, NH 03221

Richard Guerriero

Military & Veterans Appeals, Other, Criminal, Constitutional Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

39 Central Square, Keene, NH 03431

Kerry O'Neill

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

50 Washington St., Keene, NH 03431

Theodore M Lothstein

DUI-DWI, State Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

39 Central Square, Keene, NH 03431

James Shaw

DUI-DWI, Divorce, Juvenile Law, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Rindge, NH 03461

Gerald D Neiman

Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

103 Roxbury St Ste 302B, Keene, NH 03431

Jane Holly Weintraub

Personal Injury, Criminal, Traffic, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

335 Nashua St, Milford, NH 03055

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Burgess

... The State based this request upon: (1) the defendant's character; (2) prior criminal history, which included, among other convictions, three prior convictions for escape; (3) the nature and circumstances of the offenses; and (4) potential for deterrence and rehabilitation. ...

State v. Laporte

... At the close of the State's case, the defendant moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that it failed to allege, in accordance with the criminal solicitation statute, that he acted "with a purpose that another engage in conduct constituting a crime." RSA 629:2, I (2007). ...

Hilario v. Reardon

... Id. In assessing whether Mahoney could maintain the action for malpractice against his former criminal defense attorney and her firm, we held: ... Public policy, however, dictates an augmented standard in criminal malpractice actions. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Antrim Criminal Lawyer, New Hampshire

Sponsored Law Firm

Champions Law, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Margaret Lee Leppanen

Richard Guerriero

Kerry O'Neill

Theodore M Lothstein

James Shaw

Gerald D Neiman

Jane Holly Weintraub

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PROSECUTOR

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

CORPUS DELECTI

JURY NULLIFICATION

CHARGE

ARREST

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

LARCENY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Burgess

State v. Laporte

Hilario v. Reardon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details