Arlington Misdemeanor Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

David Saperstein
About | Practice Areas
Hurley Burish, S.C.
33 East Main Street Suite 400 Madison, WI 53703» view map
Estate and Criminal Defense Law
A Law Firm You Can Trust

Dedicated to providing clients with the comprehensive, creative, and thorough work.

608-257-0945
1. David Saperstein Madison, WI
  Attorney at Law- WI
  DePaul University College of Law, J.D. 1995
2. AboutHurley Burish, S.C.
  A Law Firm You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Arlington Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Arlington Criminal lawyers.

David E. Saperstein

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI

David E. Saperstein is first, and foremost, a trial lawyer. He is in his element, at his best, when he is advocating for his clients in the courtroom.... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

608-257-0945

33 East Main Street, Madison, WI 53703

David M. Stegall

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Accident & Injury, Workers' Compensation, Animal Bite

David M. Stegall is a shareholder at Lawton & Cates who was admitted to the Wisconsin Bar in 2006 after graduating cum laude from Marquette University... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

608-282-6200

345 W Washington Ave, Madison, WI 53701

Steven W. Zaleski

Farms, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10 East Doty Street, Madison, WI 53703

Tracey Ann Wood

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, White Collar Crime, Motor Vehicle

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

6605 University Avenue, Middleton, WI 53562

J. Steven House

Traffic, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

30 W. Mifflin St., Madison, WI 53703

G Brian Brophy

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Medical Malpractice, Slip & Fall Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

118 E Washington Avenue, Madison, WI 53701

John D. Hanson

Criminal, Family Law, Children's Rights, Personal Injury

Status: Inactive Licensed: 58 Years

CONTACT

2205 Fremont Ave, Madison, WI 53704

Steven E. Mays

Criminal

CONTACT

6405 Century Ave Ste 103, Middleton, WI 53562

Kim M. Zion

Juvenile Law, Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

308 E Washington Ave, Madison, WI 53701

Marinus (Rick) J.W. Petri

Dispute Resolution, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

33 E Main St, Madison, WI 53701

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Arlington Misdemeanor Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Hurley Burish, S.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David E. Saperstein

David M. Stegall

Steven W. Zaleski

Tracey Ann Wood

J. Steven House

G Brian Brophy

John D. Hanson

Steven E. Mays

Kim M. Zion

Marinus (Rick) J.W. Petri

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

CONVICTION

PLEA BARGAIN

EAVESDROPPING

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

DIRECTED VERDICT

JUSTICE SYSTEM

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details