Bapchule Lawyer, Arizona

Featured Lawyers

(advanced lawyer search)
Show:
Sort:Distance Name Location LAWPOINTS™

1-6 of 6 matches. Page 1 of 1.

LAWPOINTS 19
James T. Manwaring (5.5 miles)
General Practice
26630 S Pinewood Dr.,
Chandler, AZ 85248, Maricopa County
LAWPOINTS 16
Ann Aphrodite Hatchion (5.8 miles)
General Practice
26437 S Lakemont Dr,
Chandler, AZ 85248, Maricopa County
LAWPOINTS 14
Wesley G Davis (6.6 miles)
General Practice
10945 E Bellflower Dr,
Chandler, AZ 85248, Maricopa County
LAWPOINTS 12
Robert J. Kroum (6.7 miles)
General Practice
26246 S Flame Tree Dr,
Chandler, AZ 85248, Maricopa County
LAWPOINTS 11
Sanford Aaron Meltzer (5.7 miles)
General Practice
26409 S Sedona Dr,
Chandler, AZ 85248, Maricopa County
LAWPOINTS 7
C. J. Occhipinti, Attorney (5.9 miles)
General Practice
26441 S. Beech Creek Drive,
Chandler, AZ 85248, Maricopa County

1-6 of 6 matches. Page 1 of 1.





Tips
Lawyer.com makes finding Bapchule Lawyers fast and easy. Refine your search for Bapchule lawyers by legal practice area. Find a quality and affordable lawyer by reviewing detail profiles for Bapchule attorneys. Many Lawyer.com featured Lawyers in Arizona will offer free legal consultations and all have Arizona law expertise.

Sample AZ Cases

... cleaning. York created a prototype of the Vortex PTO in 1994 and obtained a patent for the heat-transfer technology in 2004. ... owned). Under the APA, Blue Line paid York $174,000 for the patent and the Vortex name and logo. ...

... See Ariz. Admin. Code R20-5-155 (filing medical report into evidence). In that report, Crago stated he had performed a neurobehavioral evaluation of Passaro and that the results showed depressed brain functioning consistent with toxic exposure to mold. ...

... See, eg, ARS § 20-252(8). SCD, which sold interactive electronic "whiteboards" for educational use, purchased a credit insurance policy (the "Policy") from ... Since it is clear, the debtor is disputing the debt and any potential loss payment due you would be held in abeyance until a ...

... testified convincingly and presented persuasive evidence that there was no intent to transfer any ownership interest in the house to Wife." The trial court explained that "[i]n making this decision, the court relies on the fact that the purpose behind the Trust was estate planning . . . ...

... The complaint raised various federal constitutional challenges to Proposition 202, [1] a ballot initiative passed by voters in 2002 and which made the Indian Gaming Preservation and Self-Reliance Act ("the Act") state law. [2]. ...