Carlton Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ryan Mergl
About | Practice Areas
Mergl Law
31 Vine Avenue Sharon, PA 16146» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Defending Your Rights

I personally provide all clients with the dedication, service, and attention necessary to achieve the best outcome in every case.

800-690-3471
1. Ryan Mergl Sharon, PA
  Attorney at Law- PA, 2006
  Duquesne University School of Law, JD 2006
2. AboutMergl Law
  Planning for your future, Protection for your present
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Carlton Felony lawyer.
Below are all Carlton Criminal lawyers.

J Wesley Rowden

Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Masonic, Meadville, PA 16335

Jeffrey K. Millin

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

10744 State Highway 18, Conneaut Lake, PA 16316

Candace Courtney Garrett

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

Greenville, PA 16125

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

... The primary issue raised is whether Respondent's felony convictions for fraudulently procuring a credit card constitute "infamous crimes" for purposes of Article II, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which prohibits anyone convicted of such an offense from holding an ...

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

... [4] Appellant asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in grading forgery of a money order as a second-degree felony. We hold Appellant's negotiation of a counterfeit United States Postal Service money order constituted ...

Commonwealth v. Graham

... The suppression court did not err. Â¶ 7 Appellant next argues the court erred by grading the burglary charge as a felony of the first degree because the structure at issue was not ... (c) Grading.â€”. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), burglary is a felony of the first degree. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Carlton Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Mergl Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

J Wesley Rowden

Jeffrey K. Millin

Candace Courtney Garrett

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

IMPEACH

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

IMPRISON

ACTUS REUS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

DIRECTED VERDICT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

Commonwealth v. Graham

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details