Chicago Felony Lawyer, Illinois, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Darryl Goldberg
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Darryl A. Goldberg
33 N Dearborn St Suite 1830 Chicago, IL 60602» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Because Experience Matters

When a trial is in your future, make sure Chicago criminal defense attorney Darryl Goldberg is at your side. Defending your rights is the most important thing right now.

800-901-8970
1. Darryl Goldberg Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 2003
  Chicago-Kent College of Law J.D. 2003
2. AboutLaw Offices of Darryl A. Goldberg
  Because Experience Matters
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Vincent Joseph Pagano

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1540 W. North Avenue, Chicago, IL 60642

Steven Goldman

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

22 W. Washington Street, Chicago, IL 60602

Sam Worley

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

3535 N Pulaski Rd, Chicago, IL 60641

Jonathan Samuel Goldman

Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

150 N. Michigan, Chicago, IL 60601

Catherine R. Brukalo

Workers' Compensation, Felony, Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

7610 W North Ave, Elmwood Park, IL 60707

Michael Young

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

9842 Roosevelt Road, Westchester, IL 60154

Daniel James Mccreary

Residential Real Estate, Traffic, Trusts, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

7442A Harrison Street, Forest Park, IL 60130

Kevin Pechous

Federal Appellate Practice, Felony, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Riverside, IL 60546

Kevin Kenneth Pechous

Federal Appellate Practice, Felony, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Riverside, IL 60546

Steven Goldman

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

One Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, IL 60154

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Smith

... the consolidated cases on appeal, we are asked to decide whether a trial court must provide the jury with separate verdict forms when a defendant who is charged with multiple counts of murder based on the various mental states (knowing, intentional, and felony murder) asks ...

People v. Davis

... The first degree murder charge was brought under three different theoriesâ€”intentional murder, knowing murder (also called strong probability murder), and felony murder. See 720 ILCS 5/9-1(a) (West 2004). ... II. The Felony-Murder Instruction. ...

In re Lakisha M.

... 5-4-3 of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/5-4-3 (West 2004)), is unconstitutional as applied to respondent, Lakisha M., a minor who was adjudicated delinquent, by the circuit court of Cook County, after being found guilty of committing a nonsexual felony offense. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Chicago Felony Lawyer, Illinois, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Darryl A. Goldberg

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Vincent Joseph Pagano

Steven Goldman

Sam Worley

Jonathan Samuel Goldman

Catherine R. Brukalo

Michael Young

Daniel James Mccreary

Kevin Pechous

Kevin Kenneth Pechous

Steven Goldman

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ARREST

CRIMINAL INSANITY

MOTION IN LIMINE

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

BURDEN OF PROOF

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

SELF-DEFENSE

INTERROGATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Smith

People v. Davis

In re Lakisha M.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details