Cullen Guilmartin | Glastonbury Personal Injury Lawyer

Sarpu v. Altaquip, LLC, 57 Conn. L. Rptr. 324, 2013 WL 6989514 (Conn.Super. 2013) (granting third-party defendants’ motion to strike apportionment complaint asserting that the complaint improperly asserts a claim outside the scope of the Connecticut Product Liability Act, General Statutes § 52–572h (“CPLA”)). •Associated Elec. Gas Ins. Services v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc., Docket No. 3:11-cv-00715-JCH, Unreported, Ruling Re; Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.Conn. Oct. 23, 2012) (J. Hall) (granting summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ claims for replacement power as being unrecoverable commercial loss, damages not recoverable under the CPLA between commercial parties). •Avitable v. 1 Burr Road Operating Co. II, LLC, 2010 WL 2926242 (Conn.Super. 2010) (striking all ten (10) counts of plaintiff’s complaint as being legally insufficient). •Drucker v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 2009 WL 2231654 (Conn.Super. 2009) (granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment on argument that there was no evidence that plaintiff was exposed to asbestos from defendant’s products). •Associated Elec. Gas Ins. Services v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc., 2013 WL 4456640 (D.Conn. 2013) (ordering sanctions against plaintiffs for discovery violations). •Boulay v. A.O. Smith Corp., 2010 WL 654349 (Conn.Super. 2010) (obtaining summary judgment as to claim of intervening plaintiff in asbestos personal injury action).