Daggett DUI-DWI Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Nickolas Hannawa
About | Practice Areas
Hannawa Law PC
2909 E Big Beaver Rd Troy, MI 48083» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Full-service legal experts on your side.

Whatever the specific details of your situation may be, our attorneys are ready to fight for you and guide you through every step of the process.

248-466-0770
1. Nickolas Hannawa Troy, MI
  Attorney at Law, MI
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D. 2013
2. AboutHannawa Law PC
  Full-service legal experts on your side.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Daggett DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Daggett Criminal lawyers.

Gerald Mason

Real Estate, Wills & Probate, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

915 14Th, Menominee, MI 49858

Daniel F. Anderson

Other, Government, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

110 E B St, Iron Mountain, MI 49801

John R. Filoramo

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

504 Ludington St, Escanaba, MI 49829

John B. Economopoulos

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

310 Ludington St, Escanaba, MI 49829

Steven C. Parks

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

310 Ludington St, Escanaba, MI 49829

Trenton Matthew Stupak

Lawsuit & Dispute, Defect and Lemon Law, Immigration, Pension & Benefits, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

205 Ludington Street, Escanaba, MI 49829

Ralph B. Blasier

Power of Attorney, Dispute Resolution, Child Custody, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

700 Lake Shore Dr, Escanaba, MI 49829

Kalen E. Lipe

Wrongful Termination, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Iron Mountain, MI 49801

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

GREEN CARD

The well-known term for an Alien Registration Receipt Card. This plastic photo identification card is given to individuals who are legal permanent residents of ... (more...)

The well-known term for an Alien Registration Receipt Card. This plastic photo identification card is given to individuals who are legal permanent residents of the United States. It serves as a U.S. entry document in place of a visa, enabling permanent residents to return to the United States after temporary absences. The key characteristic of a green card is that it allows the holder to live permanently in the United States. Unless you abandon your residence or violate certain criminal or immigration laws, your green card can never be taken away. Possession of a green card also allows you to work in the United States legally. Those who hold green cards for a certain length of time may eventually apply for U.S. citizenship. Green cards have an expiration date of ten years from issuance. This does not mean that your permanent resident status expires. You must simply apply for a new card.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCarthy v. BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP

... On March 19, 2007, a local business owner, whose son had been prosecuted for a DUI in Brownstown, came to a board [of trustees] meeting to discuss an anonymous letter alleging a township officer received preferential treatment relating to a DUI stop. ...

People v. Ward

... In State v Eaton, [13] the defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence (DUI) and transported to the county jail. ... Defendant was charged with one count of DUI and one count of possession of a controlled substance. ...

People v. Ward

... In State v. Eaton, [13] the defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence (DUI) and transported to the county jail. ... Defendant was charged with one count of DUI and one count of possession of a controlled substance. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Daggett DUI-DWI Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Hannawa Law PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Gerald Mason

Daniel F. Anderson

John R. Filoramo

John B. Economopoulos

Steven C. Parks

Trenton Matthew Stupak

Ralph B. Blasier

Kalen E. Lipe

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

PLEA

ACCOMPLICE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

WARRANT

EAVESDROPPING

PLEA BARGAIN

GREEN CARD

SEARCH WARRANT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCarthy v. BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP

People v. Ward

People v. Ward

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details