De Forest DUI-DWI Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

David Saperstein
About | Practice Areas
Hurley Burish, S.C.
33 East Main Street Suite 400 Madison, WI 53703» view map
Estate and Criminal Defense Law
A Law Firm You Can Trust

Dedicated to providing clients with the comprehensive, creative, and thorough work.

608-257-0945
1. David Saperstein Madison, WI
  Attorney at Law- WI
  DePaul University College of Law, J.D. 1995
2. AboutHurley Burish, S.C.
  A Law Firm You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

David E. Saperstein

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI

David E. Saperstein is first, and foremost, a trial lawyer. He is in his element, at his best, when he is advocating for his clients in the courtroom.... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

608-257-0945

33 East Main Street, Madison, WI 53703

Steven W. Zaleski

Farms, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10 East Doty Street, Madison, WI 53703

J. Steven House

Traffic, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

30 W. Mifflin St., Madison, WI 53703

Tracey Ann Wood

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, White Collar Crime, Motor Vehicle

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

6605 University Avenue, Middleton, WI 53562

Marinus (Rick) J.W. Petri

Dispute Resolution, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

33 E Main St, Madison, WI 53701

Christopher Van Wagner

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 East Main Street, Madison, WI 53703

Robert D. Zitowsky

Patent, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

131 W. Wilson St., Madison, WI 53703

Christopher T Van Wagner

Environmental Law, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10 E. Doty St., Madison, WI 53703

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Carter

... Id. at 100. In rejecting the plaintiff's challenge, the court clarified that a summary suspension under the "zero tolerance" law is not a summary suspension under DUI law, and therefore "[p]laintiff's reliance on DUI law is puzzling because plaintiff was not arrested for DUI." Id. ...

State v. Carter

State v. MALSBURY

... The State counters that because Malsbury's Washington conviction was originally charged as driving under the influence (DUI) and later amended to reckless driving with OWI-like penalties, the conviction counts for purposes of Wisconsin's OWI laws. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

De Forest DUI-DWI Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Hurley Burish, S.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David E. Saperstein

Steven W. Zaleski

J. Steven House

Tracey Ann Wood

Marinus (Rick) J.W. Petri

Christopher Van Wagner

Robert D. Zitowsky

Christopher T Van Wagner

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

SEARCH WARRANT

CORPUS DELECTI

GRAND JURY

PLEA BARGAIN

IMPEACH

SELF-DEFENSE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CAPITAL CASE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Carter

State v. Carter

State v. MALSBURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details