Douglas M. Chapman, Attorney
Mr. Chapman is a litigator specializing in insurance coverage. In his insurance coverage practice, Mr. Chapman represents the firm's insurance carrier clients in disputes against policyholders regarding the scope of insurance policy coverage. Mr. Chapman also represents the firm's insurance carrier clients against other insurance carriers pertaining to priority of coverage, contribution, indemnification, and reimbursement. Mr. Chapman also represents the firm's insurance carrier clients in no-fault automobile insurance coverage and litigation. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Chapman practiced insurance coverage and insurance coverage litigation in California, with particular emphasis on coverage issues arising out of construction defect, environmental contamination, automotive negligence, and trucker's negligence. Mr. Chapman is admitted to practice in both Michigan and California.
|Education:||University of California at Berkeley B.S.|
|Admissions:||U.S. District Court Central District of California 1998|
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan 2005
U.S. District Court Northern District of California 1997
U.S. District Court Western District of Michigan 2006
U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit 1998
Listing provided by FindLaw. How to update or change your listing?
|Southfield Insurance Lawyer|
Wheaton Divorce Lawyers Named 2015 Illinois Super Lawyers
Wheaton divorce lawyers Andrew P. Cores and Wendy M. Musielak of Cores Family Law Group have been named 2015 Super Lawyers.
by Wendy Musielak
Medical Malpractice Lawsuits against Unnecessary Surgeries
Millions of surgeries are performed in the United States every year, and most of these surgeries are meant to save the lives of the patients. However, around half of these surgeries may not even be necessary.
by David Zevan
A Motion for Reconsideration Does Not Always Toll the Deadline to Note an Appeal
Many lay persons and lawyers alike believe that a motion for reconsideration tolls the deadline to note an appeal. This is only true when the motion is filed within the time prescribed for a motion to alter or amend the judgment.
by Jason Ostendorf