Drums Child Support Lawyer, Pennsylvania
SPONSORED LAWYERS
1-2 of 2 matches. Page 1 of 1
204 E Broad St, Tamaqua, PA 18252
Profile LAWPOINTS™36/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
Wendy Schneider
Litigation, Divorce, Child Support, Child Custody
Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years
321 Spruce Street, Scranton, PA 18503
Profile LAWPOINTS™32/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
TIPS
Easily find Drums Child Support Lawyers and Drums Child Support Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Divorce & Family Law areas including Adoption, Child Custody, Divorce and Family Law attorneys.
LEGAL TERMS
PROVOCATION
The act of inciting another person to do a particular thing. In a fault divorce, provocation may constitute a defense to the divorce, preventing it from going t... (more...)
The act of inciting another person to do a particular thing. In a fault divorce, provocation may constitute a defense to the divorce, preventing it from going through. For example, if a wife suing for divorce claims that her husband abandoned her, the husband might defend the suit on the grounds that she provoked the abandonment by driving him out of the house.
NEXT OF KIN
The closest relatives, as defined by state law, of a deceased person. Most states recognize the spouse and the nearest blood relatives as next of kin.
EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION
A legal principle, followed by most states, under which assets and earnings acquired during marriage are divided equitably (fairly) at divorce. In theory, equit... (more...)
A legal principle, followed by most states, under which assets and earnings acquired during marriage are divided equitably (fairly) at divorce. In theory, equitable means equal, but in practice it often means that the higher wage earner gets two-thirds to the lower wage earner's one-third. If a spouse obtains a fault divorce, the 'guilty' spouse may receive less than his equitable share upon divorce.
DISSOLUTION
A term used instead of divorce in some states.
JOINT CUSTODY
An arrangement by which parents who do not live together share the upbringing of a child. Joint custody can be joint legal custody (in which both parents have a... (more...)
An arrangement by which parents who do not live together share the upbringing of a child. Joint custody can be joint legal custody (in which both parents have a say in decisions affecting the child) joint physical custody (in which the child spends a significant amount of time with both parents) or, very rarely, both.
MARITAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
See divorce agreement.
CONSOLIDATED OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT (COBRA)
A federal law requiring that employers offer employees -- and their spouses and dependents -- continuing insurance coverage if their work hours are cut or they ... (more...)
A federal law requiring that employers offer employees -- and their spouses and dependents -- continuing insurance coverage if their work hours are cut or they lose their job for any reason other than gross misconduct. Courts are still in the process of determining the meaning of gross misconduct, but it's clearly more serious than poor performance or judgment. COBRA also makes an ex-spouse and children eligible to receive group rate health insurance provided by the other ex-spouse's employer for three years following a divorce.
WRONGFUL DEATH RECOVERIES
After a wrongful death lawsuit, the portion of a judgment intended to compensate a plaintiff for having to live without a deceased person. The compensation is i... (more...)
After a wrongful death lawsuit, the portion of a judgment intended to compensate a plaintiff for having to live without a deceased person. The compensation is intended to cover the earnings and the emotional comfort and support the deceased person would have provided.
INJUNCTION
A court decision that is intended to prevent harm--often irreparable harm--as distinguished from most court decisions, which are designed to provide a remedy fo... (more...)
A court decision that is intended to prevent harm--often irreparable harm--as distinguished from most court decisions, which are designed to provide a remedy for harm that has already occurred. Injunctions are orders that one side refrain from or stop certain actions, such as an order that an abusive spouse stay away from the other spouse or that a logging company not cut down first-growth trees. Injunctions can be temporary, pending a consideration of the issue later at trial (these are called interlocutory decrees or preliminary injunctions). Judges can also issue permanent injunctions at the end of trials, in which a party may be permanently prohibited from engaging in some conduct--for example, infringing a copyright or trademark or making use of illegally obtained trade secrets. Although most injunctions order a party not to do something, occasionally a court will issue a 'mandatory injunction' to order a party to carry out a positive act--for example, return stolen computer code.
SAMPLE LEGAL CASES
Style v. Shaub
... 1 Appellant Sharon L. Style ("Style") appeals the order of the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania dismissing a petition for child support filed on behalf of her
adult son, Dustin Charles Shaub ("Dustin"). After careful review, we affirm. ...
Krebs v. Krebs
... T. Krebs n/k/a Sheila T. Johnson ("Mother") and Appellee/Cross-Appellant, William A Krebs, III
("Father"), appeal from the order entered in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, which
granted Mother's 2006 petition to modify the parties' existing child support order, upon ...
McMullen v. Kutz
... that Appellee Ronald E. Kutz ("Husband") breached the agreement by failing to pay Appellant
Marjorie R. McMullen ("Wife") sufficient child support and that the contract provided that the
breaching party must pay the attorney fees expended by the non-breaching party. ...
FILTER BY:
- Free Consultation
- Male
- Female
- Suspended
PRACTICE AREAS
- Accident & Injury
- Bankruptcy & Debt
- Business
- Civil & Human Rights
- Consumer Rights
- Criminal
- Divorce & Family Law
- -Adoption
- -Child Custody
- -Guardianships & Conservatorships
- -Custody & Visitation
- Child Support
- -Divorce
- -Alimony & Spousal Support
- -Family Law
- -Collaborative Law
- -Domestic Violence & Neglect
- -Paternity
- -Prenuptial Agreements
- Employment
- Environmental Law
- Estate
- Government
- Health Care
- Immigration
- Industry Specialties
- Intellectual Property
- International
- Lawsuit & Dispute
- Mass Torts
- Motor Vehicle
- Real Estate
- Tax
- Other