Dublin DUI-DWI Lawyer, California, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
James Dal Bon
Contact Us
Law Office of James Dal Bon
95 S Market St 3rd Fl San Jose, CA 95113 » view map
Santa Monica Employment Law
Employment Representation

The Law Offices of James Dal Bon are poised to help during this difficult time, call today and speak with an Attorney right away.

800-913-2581
1. James Dal Bon San Jose, CA
  Attorney At Law - CA, 1992
  University of San Francisco, J.D. - 1991
2. Frequently Asked Questions
  Enter text from site here
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Call today for your initial consultation.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Charles Casey Nice

Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

4300 Black Ave, Pleasanton, CA 94566

Megan Amanda Miller

Employee Rights, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

2415 Valley Blvd, San Ramon, CA 94583

Harry J. Traback

DUI-DWI, Criminal, White Collar Crime

Status: Inactive Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

5674 Stoneridge Dr, Pleasanton, CA 94588

Chris Feasel

DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

11040 Bollinger Canyon Rd, San Ramon, CA 94582

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

... liquor" in violation of the generic DUI law. (Id., 772 A.2d at pp. 1088, 1091.) The Vermont Supreme Court agreed. (Id. at p. 1091.) The court observed that "any evidence raising a doubt as to [the] defendant's condition, which is the ultimate question in a generic DWI prosecution . ...

People v. Landon

... OPINION. LAMBDEN, J.â€”. On August 14, 2008, defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI) with a blood-alcohol level greater than 0.08 percent (Veh. Code, Â§ 23152, subd. (b)); she admitted four prior DUI 1099 convictions. ...

People v. Patel

... In exchange for a grant of probation, defendant Javid Patel entered negotiated pleas of no contest to alternative felony counts of "generic" and "per se" [1] negligent driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) that resulted in bodily injury to another, and a misdemeanor count of ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dublin DUI-DWI Lawyer, California, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of James Dal Bon

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Charles Casey Nice

Megan Amanda Miller

Harry J. Traback

Chris Feasel

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTENTIONAL TORT

WARRANT

CHARGE

PROSECUTE

IMPEACH

MISTRIAL

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

PLEA BARGAIN

SEARCH WARRANT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

People v. Landon

People v. Patel

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details