Ephraim Lawyer, Utah

Refine by Legal Issues

Accident / Injury
Accident, Car Accident, Dangerous Products, Dog Bite, Medical Malpractice
Defense
Criminal Defense, DUI/DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Traffic Tickets, White Collar
Taxes / Estate Planning
Income Tax, Estate Planning, Social Security, Trusts, Wills & Probate
Family
Adoption, Child Support, Divorce, Elder Law, Juvenile Law, Immigration/Visa
Employment
Worker Rights, Discrimination, Harassment, Worker's Comp., Wrongful Termination
Financial
Bankruptcy, Debt Collection, Credit Card Debt, Foreclosure, Loans
House / Home
Construction, Eviction/Foreclosure, Real Estate, Tenant Rights, Zoning
Lawsuit / Dispute
Arbitration, Class Action, Dispute Resolution, Lawsuit, Litigation, Mediation
Consumer Protection
Asbestos, Consumer Rights, Motor Vehicle, Personal Injury, Product Liability
Business / Corporate
Banking/Finance, Corporate, International, Patent/Trademark, Organization, Technology
Government
Civil Rights, Medicare/Medicaid, Social Security, State/Local, U.S. Courts

Featured Lawyers

(advanced lawyer search)
Show:
Sort:Distance Name Location LAWPOINTS™

1-12 of 12 matches. Page 1 of 1.

LAWPOINTS 24
Douglas L Neeley (6.5 miles)
Divorce
501 S Main St,
Ephraim, UT 84627, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 34
Niel H. Lund (11.1 miles)
Adoption, Divorce, Child Custody, Bankruptcy, Estate
40 N Main St,
Manti, UT 84642, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 19
Bryan Keisel (10.7 miles)
General Practice
665 East 200 South,
Manti, UT 84642, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 19
Connie L Mower (11.2 miles)
General Practice
50 South Main Street,
Manti, UT 84642, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 14
Thomas C Anderson (6.0 miles)
General Practice
356 East 200 South,
Ephraim, UT 84627, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 14
Emily D Peterson (6.3 miles)
General Practice
150 E. College Avenue,
Ephraim, UT 84627, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 17
David S Tibbs (11.2 miles)
General Practice
55 S Main St, Ste 22
Manti, UT 84642, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 14
Stony V Olsen (11.0 miles)
General Practice
497 E 400 S, P.O. Box 342
Manti, UT 84642, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 14
Brody L Keisel (11.1 miles)
General Practice
160 N Main St, Ste 306
Manti, UT 84642, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 9
Ted S. Meikle (6.5 miles)
General Practice
450 S Main St,
Ephraim, UT 84627, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 9
Kevin L Daniels (11.1 miles)
General Practice
160 N Main Street, PO Box 157
Manti, UT 84642, Sanpete County
LAWPOINTS 7
Phillip M. Allred (6.2 miles)
General Practice
71 E 4005,
Ephraim, UT 84627, Sanpete County

1-12 of 12 matches. Page 1 of 1.


I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use & Privacy Policy.
Information on Legal Practice Sponsorships



Tips
Lawyer.com makes finding Ephraim Lawyers fast and easy. Refine your search for Ephraim lawyers by legal practice area. Find a quality and affordable lawyer by reviewing detail profiles for Ephraim attorneys. Many Lawyer.com featured Lawyers in Utah will offer free legal consultations and all have Utah law expertise.

Sample UT Cases

262 P.3d 1187 (2011). DUCHESNE LAND v. DIVISION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION. No. 20110510. Supreme Court of Utah. August 17, 2011. Petition for certiorari denied.

246 P.3d 1213 (2011). 2011 UT App 12. ATLANTIC CREDIT AND FINANCE, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Kristen JENSEN, Defendant and Appellant. No. ... PER CURIAM: ¶ 1 Kristen Jensen appeals the trial court's entry of judgment against her in a debt collection action. ...

... The district court also held that taxation of Summit Water's water distribution facilities and the separate taxation of the real property owned by Summit Water's shareholders did not constitute double taxation. ... II. SUMMIT WATER WAS NOT SUBJECTED TO DOUBLE TAXATION. ...

¶ 1 This appeal comes to us following a bench trial in a breach of contract action. The trial court concluded that the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) breached its contract with Meadow Valley Contractors (MVC) when UDOT's project engineer told MVC and its subcontractor, ...

... She sought child support and alimony. ... III. THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN ASSUMING THE REGULARITY OF THE PROCEEDINGS REGARDING THE TRIAL COURT'S FINDING THAT DAVID WAS NOT ENTITLED TO RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT. ...