Escambia County, FL White Collar Crime Lawyers, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Escambia White Collar Crime lawyer.
Below are all Escambia lawyers.

Russell A. Badders

Election & Political, Contract, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

501 Commendencia Street, Pensacola, FL 32502

James S. Campbell

Condominiums, Commercial Real Estate, Real Estate, Banking & Finance

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

501 Commendencia Street, Pensacola, FL 32502

Russell H. Rein

Animal Bite, Criminal, Motor Vehicle, Business Organization

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

9511 Holsberry Road, Pensacola, FL 32534

Steven J. Baker

Estate Planning, Family Law, Insurance, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

15 West La Rua Street, Pensacola, FL 32501

E. Jane Brehany

Farms, Alimony & Spousal Support, Divorce, Child Support

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

412 Bayfront Pkwy., Pensacola, FL 32502

J. Arby Van Slyke

Banking & Finance, Car Accident, Personal Injury, Products Liability

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

618 West Garden St., Pensacola, FL 32591

Sally Bussell Fox

Banking & Finance, Corporate, Collection, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

P.O. Drawer 1271, Pensacola, FL 32591

W. Spencer Mitchem

Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Mental Health, Wills & Probate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

501 Commendencia Street, Pensacola, FL 32502

Cheryl Ann Alverson

Adoption, Alimony & Spousal Support, Child Support, Children's Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

700 S. Palafox St., Ste 210, Pensacola, FL 32502

Ross A. Keene

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1622 N. 9th Ave., Pensacola, FL 32503

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Escambia County, FL White Collar Crime Lawyers, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Russell A. Badders

James S. Campbell

Russell H. Rein

Steven J. Baker

E. Jane Brehany

J. Arby Van Slyke

Sally Bussell Fox

W. Spencer Mitchem

Cheryl Ann Alverson

Ross A. Keene

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CONVICTION

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CRIME

MOTION IN LIMINE

HABEAS CORPUS

NOLLE PROSEQUI

JURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details