Frankfort DUI-DWI Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Frankfort DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Frankfort Criminal lawyers.

Frederik F. Stig-nielsen

Agriculture, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Native People

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

427 Main Street, Frankfort, MI 49635

Jesse Latta Williams

Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2899 Benzie Highway, Benzonia, MI 49616

John B. Daugherty

Real Estate, Estate Planning, Child Custody, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

249 S Benzie Blvd, Beulah, MI 49617

Anthony J. Cicchelli

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

448 Court Pl, Beulah, MI 49617

James Bearinger

Criminal, Family Law

Status: Suspended Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

180 S Benzie Blvd, Beulah, MI 49617

Hilary A. Eriksen

Estate, Criminal

Status: Suspended Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

7702 Lake St, Bear Lake, MI 49614

Michael D. Lewis

Collaborative Law, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

12801 S. Woodhaven Lane, Traverse City, MI 49684

William N. Grant

Traffic, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

Manistee, MI 49660

Leslie E. Van Alstine

Real Estate, Criminal, Native People, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

255 River St, Manistee, MI 49660

John R. Brakora

Traffic, Employee Rights, Family Law, Criminal, Wrongful Death

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

415 3Rd St, Manistee, MI 49660

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCarthy v. BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP

... On March 19, 2007, a local business owner, whose son had been prosecuted for a DUI in Brownstown, came to a board [of trustees] meeting to discuss an anonymous letter alleging a township officer received preferential treatment relating to a DUI stop. ...

People v. Ward

... In State v Eaton, [13] the defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence (DUI) and transported to the county jail. ... Defendant was charged with one count of DUI and one count of possession of a controlled substance. ...

People v. Ward

... In State v. Eaton, [13] the defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence (DUI) and transported to the county jail. ... Defendant was charged with one count of DUI and one count of possession of a controlled substance. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Frankfort DUI-DWI Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Frederik F. Stig-nielsen

Jesse Latta Williams

John B. Daugherty

Anthony J. Cicchelli

James Bearinger

Hilary A. Eriksen

Michael D. Lewis

William N. Grant

Leslie E. Van Alstine

John R. Brakora

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INFRACTION

INSANITY

INTENTIONAL TORT

SENTENCE

BURDEN OF PROOF

SPECIFIC INTENT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

INTERROGATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCarthy v. BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP

People v. Ward

People v. Ward

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details