Grace DUI-DWI Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Craig Parrish
About | Practice Areas
Parrish Law Office
602 S 5th Ave P.O. Box 4321 Pocatello, ID 83205» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Quality & Caring Legal Services

Craig Parrish is a dedicated lawyer to his clients in the state of Idaho & focuses on helping those in need of quality, inexpensive legal assistance.

800-878-3120
1. Craig Parrish Pocatello, ID
  Attorney at Law - ID, 1993
  University of Idaho J.D. 1993
2. AboutParrish Law Office
  Quality & Caring Legal Services
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Grace DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Grace Criminal lawyers.

Kelly Kenneth Kumm

Juvenile Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, US Courts, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1305 E. Center Street, Pocatello, ID 83201

Joseph Goddaeus Ballstaedt

Criminal, Real Estate, Contract, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

201 E Center St., Pocatello, ID 83204

Nolan Ernest Wittrock

Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

201 East Center Street, Pocatello, ID 83201

Carol Tippi Jarman

Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

201 East Center Street, Pocatello, ID 83201

Brian J. Cheney

Personal Injury, Business, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

216 West Whitman, Pocatello, ID 83204

Keith A Zollinger

Traffic, Transportation & Shipping, Employment, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

850 E Center St, Pocatello, ID 83201

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Cantrell

... officer smelled alcohol and suspected the defendant of DWI, performed field sobriety tests, and ultimately arrested the defendant on DWI, the subsequent ... July 1, 2009) (distinguishing the arrest for a routine traffic violation in Gant from an arrest for DUI, particularly noting that the ...

State v. DeWitt

... DeWitt was charged with misdemeanor second-time DUI. ... 2001). DeWitt argues that the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement does not apply because he was charged with misdemeanor DUI rather than a felony. This is not a persuasive argument. ...

State v. Leslie

... PERRY, Judge. Kent Jay Leslie appeals from his judgment of conviction for felony driving under the influence (DUI). ... I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE. Leslie was stopped for driving erratically and failed several field sobriety tests. He was charged with misdemeanor DUI. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Grace DUI-DWI Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

Parrish Law Office

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kelly Kenneth Kumm

Joseph Goddaeus Ballstaedt

Nolan Ernest Wittrock

Carol Tippi Jarman

Brian J. Cheney

Keith A Zollinger

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SELF-DEFENSE

IMPRISON

BURGLARY

VENIREMEN

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

BAIL

BURDEN OF PROOF

HOT PURSUIT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Cantrell

State v. DeWitt

State v. Leslie

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details