2. / /

Hanover Employment Discrimination Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: Affirmative Action, Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination

  SPONSORED LAWYERS

1-4 of 4 matches. Page 1 of 1  

Margaret A. Luger-Nikolai

Affirmative Action, Age Discrimination, Americans with Disabilities Act , Collective Bargaining
Status:  In Good Standing           
CONTACT
1660 Highway 100 South, Minneapolis, MN 55416
Profile LAWPOINTS™40/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers

Alan Scott Milavetz

Mass Torts, Alcoholic Beverages, Age Discrimination, Affirmative Action, Americans with Disabilities Act
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  39 Years
CONTACT
1915 57Th Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 55430
Profile LAWPOINTS™40/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers

Gerald T. Laurie

Employment, Employment Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, Sexual Harassment, Litigation
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  57 Years
CONTACT
5901 Cedar Lake Road, Minneapolis, MN 55416
Profile LAWPOINTS™59/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers

Dana Lynn Gerber

Employment Discrimination, Workers' Compensation, Property & Casualty, Construction
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  17 Years
CONTACT
5411 Circle Down Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55416
Profile LAWPOINTS™17/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
Member Representative

800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Member Representative

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Hanover Employment Discrimination Lawyers and Hanover Employment Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Employment areas including Employee Rights, Employment Contracts, Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Labor Law, Occupational Safety & Health, Pension & Benefits, Sexual Harassment, Whistleblower, Workers' Compensation and Wrongful Termination attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Bahr v. Capella University

... slowly" in the review process to "minimize the performance issues raised" in the review and to allow the legal department to review LA's performance review before showing it to LA All of these actions benefited LA Generally, to prevail on an employment discrimination claim, the ...

Monson v. Rochester Athletic Club

... When appellants clarified that their claims were also asserted under a disparate-impact theory, respondents argued that the disparate-impact theory is not available under the MHRA for claims arising outside the context of employment discrimination. ...

Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.

... First, we agree with the Supreme Court's reasoning and conclude that a strict liability standard in all cases of supervisor harassment would be contrary to the MHRA's express policy of "secur[ing] for persons in this state, freedom from discrimination: (1) in employment because of ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

  • Free Consultation
  • Male
  • Female
  • Suspended

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS