Imperial Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Sean Logue
Google+ | Contact Us
Sean Logue & Associates
429 4th Ave. Suite 1601 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 » view map
DUI, Sex Crimes, Drug Crimes, Expungements
Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

Our lawyers bring a thorough understanding of criminal issues to help minimize the damage that a DUI charge can bring to our clients.

412-389-0805
1. Sean Logue Pittsburgh, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2008
  West Virginia, J.D. - 2007
2. Google+
  Visit us and follow on Google+ to interact on social media.
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Free initial consultation. Contact us today.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Imperial Felony lawyer.
Below are all Imperial Criminal lawyers.

Thomas James Michael

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Motor Vehicle, Personal Injury, Estate, Business

Thomas Michael is a practicing lawyer in the state of Pennsylvania. Mr. Michael received his J.D. from the University of Pittsburgh in 2007.

CONTACT

412-389-3051

1000 Cliff Mine Rd, Pittsburgh, PA 15275

James Francis Donohue

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Employment, Family Law, Estate

James Donohue is a practicing lawyer in the state of Pennsylvania. Attorney Donohue received his J.D. from Oklahoma City University School of Law.

CONTACT

800-971-0891

1396 Riverview Rd, Crescent, PA 15046

Jesse J. White

Election & Political, Estate, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

107 South McDonald Street, Mc Donald, PA 15057

Anthony T. Floro

Real Estate, Estate, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

7411 University Blvd, Coraopolis, PA 15108

Kevin A Kindred

Criminal, Tax, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

337 Merchant Street, Ambridge, PA 15003

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

... The primary issue raised is whether Respondent's felony convictions for fraudulently procuring a credit card constitute "infamous crimes" for purposes of Article II, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which prohibits anyone convicted of such an offense from holding an ...

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

... [4] Appellant asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in grading forgery of a money order as a second-degree felony. We hold Appellant's negotiation of a counterfeit United States Postal Service money order constituted ...

Commonwealth v. Graham

... The suppression court did not err. Â¶ 7 Appellant next argues the court erred by grading the burglary charge as a felony of the first degree because the structure at issue was not ... (c) Grading.â€”. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), burglary is a felony of the first degree. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Imperial Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Sean Logue & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Thomas James Michael

James Francis Donohue

Jesse J. White

Anthony T. Floro

Kevin A Kindred

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

INSANITY

GRAND JURY

BURDEN OF PROOF

EAVESDROPPING

ARREST

JURY

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

Commonwealth v. Graham

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details