Isonville Criminal Lawyer, Kentucky

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

John Nathaniel Miller

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

West Liberty, KY 41472

Robin Lynn Webb

Equine, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Child Support, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

102 S Hord St, Grayson, KY 41143

Chris Ring

Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

222 Sun Street, Morehead, KY 40351

Paul Wilburn Cox

Criminal, Personal Injury, Family Law, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

800 Old Flemingsburg Road, Morehead, KY 40351

Robert Dale Ganstine

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Morehead, KY 40351

Sebastian Midhun Joy

Criminal, Personal Injury, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Catlettsburg, KY 41129

James J Barrett

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

259 Eagle Dr, Morehead, KY 40351

Michael J. Curtis

Criminal, Juvenile Law, Accident & Injury, Nursing Home, Trucking

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1544 Winchester Avenue, Ashland, KY 41101

Natasha Leigh Gussler

Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1544 Winchester Avenue, Ashland, KY 41101

Damian Gallaher

Criminal, Family Law, Personal Injury, Bankruptcy

Status: Inactive

CONTACT

Ashland, KY 41105

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

FELONY

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases... (more...)

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases, by death. For example, murder, extortion and kidnapping are felonies; a minor fist fight is usually charged as a misdemeanor, and a speeding ticket is generally an infraction.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Padilla

... Supreme Court of Kentucky. January 24, 2008. Rehearing Denied June 19, 2008. 483 Jack Conway, Attorney General of Kentucky, David A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Appellate Division, Office of the Attorney General, Frankfort, KY, Counsel for Appellant. ...

Hartsfield v. Com.

... They are testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no such ongoing emergency, and that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially 244 relevant to later criminal prosecution. [18]. ...

Leonard v. Com.

... for Appellant. Jack Conway, Attorney General, David A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, Criminal Appellate Division, Frankfort, KY, for Appellee. Opinion of the Court by Justice NOBLE. Appellant ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Isonville Criminal Lawyer, Kentucky

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John Nathaniel Miller

Robin Lynn Webb

Chris Ring

Paul Wilburn Cox

Robert Dale Ganstine

Sebastian Midhun Joy

James J Barrett

Michael J. Curtis

Natasha Leigh Gussler

Damian Gallaher

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

JURY NULLIFICATION

MISTRIAL

FELONY

PLEA BARGAIN

VENIREMEN

DIRECTED VERDICT

SELF-INCRIMINATION

INFORMATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Padilla

Hartsfield v. Com.

Leonard v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details