Lebam Criminal Lawyer, Washington, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Hill
About | Practice Areas
Russell & Hill, PLLC
1212 North Washington St. Suite 132 Spokane, WA 99201» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Professional, Personal, Proven

You have questions, and we have answers. Here at Russell & Hill, PLLC, we know how to obtain the most favorable outcome for your particular circumstances.

800-928-5340
1. James Hill Spokane, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2001
  Seattle University J.D. 2001
2. AboutRussell & Hill, PLLC
  Professional, Personal, Proven
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Matthew Joseph Kuehnl

Family Law, Traffic, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

20 Sw 12Th St, Chehalis, WA 98532

Jakob Daniel Mcghie

Commercial Real Estate, Landlord-Tenant, Traffic, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

114 W Magnolia St, Centralia, WA 98531

Donald Alan Blair

Administrative Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Securities Regulation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Centralia, WA 98531

Peter B. Tiller

Federal, Government, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Centralia, WA 98531

Lewis Handfield Zieske

Estate Planning, Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

134 Nw North St, Chehalis, WA 98532

Rachael M Tiller

Juvenile Law, Real Estate, Trusts, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

N Rock & W Pne, Centralia, WA 98531

David W Brown

Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

107 S Tower Ave, Centralia, WA 98531

Kevin R Vibbert

DUI-DWI, Consumer Bankruptcy, Commercial Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1402 Broadway St, Longview, WA 98632

Jack Bradford Micheau

Family Law, State Government, Indians & Native Populations, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

Aberdeen, WA 98520

Paul Douglas Conroy

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Aberdeen, WA 98520

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Lebam Criminal Lawyer, Washington, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

Russell & Hill, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Matthew Joseph Kuehnl

Jakob Daniel Mcghie

Donald Alan Blair

Peter B. Tiller

Lewis Handfield Zieske

Rachael M Tiller

David W Brown

Kevin R Vibbert

Jack Bradford Micheau

Paul Douglas Conroy

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

HABEAS CORPUS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

EAVESDROPPING

ASSAULT

JUSTICE SYSTEM

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

HUNG JURY

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details