Lindstrom Juvenile Law Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard Morris
About | Practice Areas
Morris Law Group PA
7380 France Ave S. Suite 250 Edina, MN 55435» view map
Criminal Defense Law
We Are Experts In What We Do

Whether it’s your home or business, you are important to us. Reach out today to set up a meeting with one of our experienced Edina lawyers.

800-872-9610
1. Richard Morris Edina, MN
  Attorney at Law- MN, 1974
  William Mitchell College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutMorris Law Group PA
  We Are Experts In What We Do
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Susan Jean Mundahl

Juvenile Law, Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

11670 Fountains Dr., Maple Grove, MN 55369

Shannon Elkins

Juvenile Law, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

Lake Calhoun Executive Center, 3033 Excelsior Blvd., Minneapolis, MN 55416

Kyle Wermerskirchen

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1001 Twelve Oaks Center Drive, Wayzata, MN 55391

Joel Button

Estate Planning, Employment, Juvenile Law, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

421 S Main St, Stillwater, MN 55082

Jeffrey J. Storey

Juvenile Law, Estate Planning, Family Law, Household Mold

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

277 Coon Rapids Boulevard N.W., Minneapolis, MN 55433

Andrew Joseph Reiland

DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

7582 Currell Blvd., Saint Paul, MN 55125

Caroline Durham

US Courts, Juvenile Law, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

101 E 5Th St, Saint Paul, MN 55101

Alex De Marco

DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal, Adoption

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

6 West 5Th Street, Saint Paul, MN 55102

Brian Mcnee Marsden

Transportation & Shipping, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

101 East 5th St, Saint Paul, MN 55118

Karen L Ives

Divorce & Family Law, Wills, Juvenile Law, Prenuptial Agreements, Alimony & Spousal Support

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

150 South Fifth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Martin

... This appeal followed. I. Martin argues that sentencing a defendant who was a juvenile at the time the crime was committed to life in prison without the possibility of release (LWOR), under Minn.Stat. Â§Â§ 260B.007, subd. 6(b), and 260B.101, subd. ...

In re Welfare of NJS

... 260B.125 (2006). This statute requires a court to consider six factors in determining whether to certify a juvenile. Id., subd. 4. One of these factors is "the child's prior record of delinquency." Id. ... 260B.125. The juvenile court ordered a certification study. ...

State v. JES

... Randall, Judge. [*]. The juvenile court revoked JES's EJJ probation because he possessed a weapon in violation of the terms of his probation. ... The juvenile court incorrectly based revocation of JES's probation on JES's possession of a weapon. We reverse and remand. FACTS. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Lindstrom Juvenile Law Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm

Morris Law Group PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Susan Jean Mundahl

Shannon Elkins

Kyle Wermerskirchen

Joel Button

Jeffrey J. Storey

Andrew Joseph Reiland

Caroline Durham

Alex De Marco

Brian Mcnee Marsden

Karen L Ives

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SELF-DEFENSE

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

JURY NULLIFICATION

CORPUS DELECTI

CRIMINAL LAW

MENS REA

BURGLARY

ACCOMPLICE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Martin

In re Welfare of NJS

State v. JES

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details