Mona Felony Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

William Melton
About | Practice Areas
Melton Law
5955 South Redwood Road Suite 103 Taylorsville, UT 84123» view map
Criminal Defense and Accident & Injury
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

Melton Law is dedicated to providing competent and great representation to our clients. We will be there to help you and answer any questions you have every step of the way.

800-952-9770
1. William Melton Taylorsville, UT
  Attorney at Law- UT, 2019
  University of Idaho College of Law, J.D. 2019
2. AboutMelton Law
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Mona Felony lawyer.
Below are all Mona Criminal lawyers.

William H. Nebeker

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Personal Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate

William Havens Nebeker handles Divorce, Child Custody, Guardianship, Modification of Divorce Decree, Child Support, Criminal Defense-Traffic Violation... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-769-5090

1896 N 1120 W, Provo, UT 84603

Randall Spencer

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Employment

A lawyer’s lawyer Randall K. Spencer, won his first jury trial in 1993 while still in law school and working under the third-year practice rule. ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-918-9480

3301 N University Ave, Provo, UT 84604

M. Paige Benjamin

Deportation, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Asylum

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

470 N. University Ave, Provo, UT 84601

Gary Hill Weight

Adoption, Alimony & Spousal Support, Criminal, Child Support

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

290 West Center Street, Provo, UT 84603

Kenneth Parkinson

Lawsuit & Dispute, Employment, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

120 East 300 North, Provo, UT 84606

Jacob S. Gunter

Mass Torts, Federal Trial Practice, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

120 East 300 North, Provo, UT 84606

Michael A. Parkes

Alimony & Spousal Support, Criminal, Bankruptcy Litigation, Child Support

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2696 North University Avenue, Provo, UT 84604

Brian John Miller

Traffic, Wrongful Termination, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

100 East Center St, Provo, UT 84606

Brian John Miller

Traffic, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

100 East Center St, Provo, UT 84606

Stephen R. Frazier

Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

290 West Center Street, Provo, UT 84603

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mona Felony Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Melton Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

William H. Nebeker

Randall Spencer

M. Paige Benjamin

Gary Hill Weight

Kenneth Parkinson

Jacob S. Gunter

Michael A. Parkes

Brian John Miller

Brian John Miller

Stephen R. Frazier

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LINEUP

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CAPITAL CASE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

CRIME

DIRECTED VERDICT

MISTRIAL

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

SPECIFIC INTENT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details