Mountainville DUI-DWI Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Kevin Conway
About | Practice Areas
Kevin T. Conway
664 Chestnut Ridge Rd Spring Valley, NY 10977Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Experience You Can Trust

Kevin T. Conway uses an individualized approach to make sure your case gets the attention it deserves.

800-741-3561
1. Kevin Conway Spring Valley, NY
  Attorney at Law - NY, 1987
  Seton Hall University J.D.
2. AboutKevin T. Conway
  Over 30 years experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Kathleen V. Wells

Litigation, Adoption, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

356 Meadow Avenue, Newburgh, NY 12550

John J. Basso

DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

263 Route 17K, Newburgh, NY 12550

Raymond D. Sprowls

Traffic, White Collar Crime, Immigration, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2294 State Route 208, Montgomery, NY 12549

Michael A. Ferraro

Real Estate, Family Law, Child Support, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

318 Main St, Cornwall, NY 12518

James Winslow

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

10 Little Britain Road, Newburgh, NY 12550

Randall Francis Inniss

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Harriman, NY 10926

John Ingrassia

Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Constitutional Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

356 Meadow Ave, Newburgh, NY 12550

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Baltes

... In the interim, Jenkins completed the field sobriety tests on Barcomb and, determining Barcomb to be under the influence of alcohol, arrested him for driving while intoxicated (hereinafter DWI), at which point Barcomb stated that he was not the driver of the vehicle. ...

MATTER OF SCHERMERHORN v. Becker

... and GARRY, JJ., concur. Stein, J. Petitioner was arrested in the Village of Stamford, Delaware 844 County for driving while intoxicated (hereinafter DWI). According to the results of a breath test administered shortly thereafter, petitioner's blood alcohol content was .15%. ...

People v. Johnson

... and McCARTHY, JJ., concur. Stein, J. Defendant was arrested and subsequently indicted for driving 1189 while intoxicated (hereinafter DWI). In addition, a special information filed by the People accused defendant of having been previously convicted of DWI. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mountainville DUI-DWI Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm

Kevin T. Conway

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kathleen V. Wells

John J. Basso

Raymond D. Sprowls

Michael A. Ferraro

James Winslow

Randall Francis Inniss

John Ingrassia

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SEARCH WARRANT

PLEA

FEDERAL COURT

ACCOMPLICE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

MENS REA

CIVIL

INTERROGATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Baltes

MATTER OF SCHERMERHORN v. Becker

People v. Johnson

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details