Murry A. Marks, Attorney


Murry A. Murry Lawyer

Murry A. Marks update listing

Personal Injury, Criminal, Professional Malpractice, Constitutional Law, General Practice, Litigation

800-788-6387


  • Profile LAWPOINTS42/ 100
    LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
    We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
    LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
    More Info for Lawyers
  • Free Consultation 
  • No Misconduct Found 
  • Accepts Credit Cards 
  • Reviews Pro Bono Cases 
  • Upgrade to a premium listing
  • Update your listing
  • LAWYERID Not Available
    LawyerID™'s identify each individual within Lawyer.com’s directory of 2M global lawyers and help to ensure that the most accurate, up-to-date records are being kept on every lawyer. If you are a practicing lawyer without a LawyerID prominently displayed on your Lawyer.com profile, please call 800-840-0600 to receive one.
    Contact Us
  • 800-788-6387

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involves. Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.

Mr. Marks is admitted to practice in the State of Missouri (1963), the United States Supreme Court (1972), The United States Tax Court (1985), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (1964) and the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (1964) and the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (1985). Mr. Marks received his undergraduate degree from Washington University in 1954 and his law degree from Washington University in 1963. Mr. Marks is a member of the Missouri Bar Association, The American Bar Association, The American Association of Justice, The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, The Missouri Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, The Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys, The First Amendment Lawyers Association, The Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis, The St. Louis County Bar Association and The American College of Legal Medicine. a Life Member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (2001), a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (2008), was selected to Who's Who in American Law (1990-present), and named Distinguished Fellow of the St. Louis Bar Foundation (1992).

Position Organization Location Duration
School Degree Major Graduation
Washington University School of LawJ.D. Law SchoolN/A  
Washington UniversityB.A.
State / Court Date
U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri1985
U.S. Tax Court1985
U.S. Supreme Court1972
U.S. Court of Appeals 8th Circuit1969
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri1964
Missouri1963
  • Ziebell v. McClure 1979

  • Wilson v. U.S. 1969

  • White v. Gallion 1978

  • Wehner v. Syntex Corp. 1985

  • Wehner v. Syntex Corp. 1984

  • Wehner v. Syntex Corp. 1983

  • Wehner v. Syntex Agribusiness, Inc. 1985

  • U.S. v. Wright 1970

  • U.S. v. Valentine 1970

  • U.S. v. Turpin 1983

  • U.S. v. Thomas 1968

  • U.S. v. Steffen 1981

  • U.S. v. Macklin 1978

  • U.S. v. Lowe 1993

  • U.S. v. Harrison 1982

  • U.S. v. Hancock 1977

  • U.S. v. Cohen 1975

  • U.S. v. Cody 1971

  • Sun World Lines, Ltd. v. March Shipping Corp. 1984

  • State v. Williamson 1983

  • State v. Turpin 1983

  • State v. Stephens 1974

  • State v. Steffen 1982

  • State v. Speed 1970

  • State v. Johnson 1975

  • State v. Green 1995

  • State v. Brown 1980

  • State v. Boyd 1973

  • State v. Ayers 1971

  • State ex rel. Gold v. Dunne 1967

  • St. Louis County v. B.A.P., Inc. 2001

  • St. Louis County v. B.A.P., Inc. 2000

  • St. Louis County v. B.A.P., Inc. 1999

  • Shatz v. U.S. Dept. of Justice 1989

  • Ross v. Ross 1999

  • Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. Whaley 1981

  • Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfall 1985

  • Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfall 1984

  • Postscript Enterprises, Inc. V. Peach 1989

  • Postscript Enterprises v. City of Bridgeton 1990

  • Postscript Enterprises v. City of Bridgeton 1988

  • Postscript Enterprises Inc. v. Whaley 1980

  • Matter of Search Warrant of Property at 3552 Gravois 1975

  • Mathes By and Through Mathes v. Nolan 1995

  • Lewis v. City of St. Louis 1985

  • Kelch v. Kelch 1970

  • Holland v. State 1999

  • Hinshaw v. Farmers and Merchants Ins. Co. 1995

  • Hampton v. Thurmand 1981

  • Elder v. Metropolitan Property and Cas. Co. 1993

  • Dae v. City of St. Louis 1980

  • Central Presbyterian Church v. Black Liberation Front 1969

  • Caldwell v. Camp 1979

  • Caldwell v. Camp 1978

  • Buford v. Ray 1997

Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat.


Lawyers with longer memberships tend to have more experience so we use the Membership date to help prioritize lawyer listings on search pages.

Verified Credentials Date Verified

Above credentials have been verified independently by Lawyer.com.

Service Type: Private

https://www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005i.png, https://www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005p.png, https://www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005f.png, https://www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005v.png, https://www.lawyer.com/seal/d/featured-medium.png, https://www.lawyer.com/seal/d/verified-medium.png, https://www.lawyer.com/seal/d/featured-small.png, https://www.lawyer.com/seal/d/verified-small.png,

To recommend or link to this lawyer as a trusted attorney, we have provided a list of sample links. Please choose the one that meet your needs.

Want a Premium Customized Photo Badge?

Call Toll Free: 800-620-0900

Lawyer Badge
Image Link 1
Murry A. Marks  Lawyer Badge
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005i.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 2
Murry A. Marks  Lawyer Badge
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005p.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 3
Murry A. Marks  Lawyer Badge
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005f.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 4
Murry A. Marks  Lawyer Badge
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005v.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 5
Murry A. Marks  Lawyer Badge
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005d/featured-medium.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 6
Murry A. Marks  Lawyer Badge
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005d/verified-medium.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 7
Murry A. Marks  Lawyer Badge
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005d/featured-small.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 8
Murry A. Marks  Lawyer Badge
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1656005d/verified-small.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Text Link 1
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom" style="width:250px;text-align:center;background-color: #fbaa02;padding:3px;"><a href="http://www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html" style="color: #fff;text-decoration:none;size: 12px;">Lawyer.com Listed: Murry A. Marks</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Text Link 2
Corresponding HTML Codes
<div id="Lcom" style="width:250px;text-align:center;background-color: #fbaa02;padding:3px;"><a href="http://www.lawyer.com/murry-marks.html" style="color: #fff;text-decoration:none;size: 12px;">Lawyer.com Verified: Murry A. Marks</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Change Date Change Field Previous Content
Murry A. Marks
4 CityPlace Drive
Suite 497
Saint Louis, MO 63141
38.655446,-90.452506

MAIN LOCATION

4 CityPlace Drive
Suite 497
Saint Louis, MO 63141


Other Locations:

WEBSITE

LAWYER BADGES

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Physician Obtains Downward Modification to Alimony Obligation
In a post-judgment divorce action, a physician was successful in obtaining a downward modification to his alimony obligation due to a substantial decrease in his income.  The parties were divorced back in 2007, and pursuant to the judgment of dissolution, the husband was required to pay alimony to the wife in the amount of $6,000 per month for a period of eleven months, followed by $5,000 per month thereafter.  The amount of the alimony obligation was modifiable upon a substantial change in circumstances in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes § 46b-86.
In Post Judgment Divorce Action, Court Determines that $1.2 Million Payment to Husband was Income, Not Liquidation of an Asset
In a post-judgment decision rendered, the Superior Court of Fairfield at Bridgeport addressed whether a payment that a husband received from his employer after the parties’ divorce constituted an asset or, alternatively, income.  The parties in this action obtained an uncontested divorce in 2008.  As part of their separation agreement, the husband was obligated to pay the wife child support in the amount of $1,600.00 per month.
Child Care Costs and the Connecticut Child Support Guidelines
In a decision rendered previously, the Connecticut Appellate Court explained the definition of “child care costs” as set forth in the Connecticut Child Support Guidelines.  In that particular case, the parties were married for approximately five years and were the parents of two minor children.  During the year of 2003, they entered into a custody stipulation which was subsequently incorporated into a comprehensive separation agreement.  The separation agreement provided that the husband would pay the wife $2,500 per month in unallocated alimony and child support for a period of five years, followed by straight child support.