North Rim Lawyer, Arizona

Featured Lawyers

(advanced lawyer search)
Show:
Sort:Distance Name Location LAWPOINTS™

1-6 of 6 matches. Page 1 of 1.

LAWPOINTS 19
Robin L Martin (26.9 miles)
Natural Resources
Grand Canyon, AZ 86023, Coconino County
LAWPOINTS 14
J R Babbitt (26.9 miles)
General Practice
Grand Canyon, AZ 86023, Coconino County
LAWPOINTS 9
David Arthur Kreider (23.8 miles)
General Practice
Grand Canyon, AZ 86023, Coconino County
LAWPOINTS 19
John Hiscock (40.6 miles)
General Practice
Pipe Spring National Monument, Hc 65 Box 5
Fredonia, AZ 86022, Coconino County
LAWPOINTS 12
Edward M. Mcclure (38.5 miles)
General Practice
Grand Canyon, AZ 86023, Coconino County
LAWPOINTS 16
Steven Marcus Knisely (42.0 miles)
General Practice
Marble Canyon, AZ 86036, Coconino County

1-6 of 6 matches. Page 1 of 1.





Tips
Lawyer.com makes finding North Rim Lawyers fast and easy. Refine your search for North Rim lawyers by legal practice area. Find a quality and affordable lawyer by reviewing detail profiles for North Rim attorneys. Many Lawyer.com featured Lawyers in Arizona will offer free legal consultations and all have Arizona law expertise.

Sample AZ Cases

... cleaning. York created a prototype of the Vortex PTO in 1994 and obtained a patent for the heat-transfer technology in 2004. ... owned). Under the APA, Blue Line paid York $174,000 for the patent and the Vortex name and logo. ...

... See Ariz. Admin. Code R20-5-155 (filing medical report into evidence). In that report, Crago stated he had performed a neurobehavioral evaluation of Passaro and that the results showed depressed brain functioning consistent with toxic exposure to mold. ...

... See, eg, ARS § 20-252(8). SCD, which sold interactive electronic "whiteboards" for educational use, purchased a credit insurance policy (the "Policy") from ... Since it is clear, the debtor is disputing the debt and any potential loss payment due you would be held in abeyance until a ...

... testified convincingly and presented persuasive evidence that there was no intent to transfer any ownership interest in the house to Wife." The trial court explained that "[i]n making this decision, the court relies on the fact that the purpose behind the Trust was estate planning . . . ...

... The complaint raised various federal constitutional challenges to Proposition 202, [1] a ballot initiative passed by voters in 2002 and which made the Indian Gaming Preservation and Self-Reliance Act ("the Act") state law. [2]. ...