Otis W. Carroll, Attorney
With over twenty-five years of litigation experience, Otis Carroll is one of the preeminent trial lawyers in East Texas. Having long focused his practice on complex civil litigation, Mr. Carroll has successfully tried numerous patent, civil fraud, oil & gas, antitrust, and breach of contract cases. A fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers and American Board of Trial Advocates, Mr. Carroll is admitted to practice before the Fifth and Eleventh Circuit United States Courts of Appeals and the United States District Courts for the Northern, Southern and Eastern Districts of Texas. Mr. Carroll previously practiced with firm of Foreman & Dyes and served as an Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas. He is a graduate of Texas A & M University (B.B.A. 1971) and the University of Texas School of Law (J.D. 1974).
|Education:||Texas A & M University B.B.A.|
|Admissions:||U.S. District Court Western District of Texas|
U.S. District Court Southern District of Texas
U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas
U.S. Court of Appeals 5th Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals 11th Circuit
Listing provided by FindLaw. How to update or change your listing?
|Tyler Antitrust Lawyer|
New BIA Decision on the Burden for Determining Mental Competence in Immigration Proceedings Matter of J-S-S-
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued an important decision in Matter of J-S-S- on November 2, 2015. The decision addressed the following question: Who has the formal burden of proof in immigration proceedings to establish whether the alien (respondent) is mentally competent...
by Alexander Segal
Chicago Car Wreck Lawyer - Tips on Choosing Car Insurance
With so many options available, it may be confusing to choose a car insurance policy.
by Matthew Willens
BIA Requests Briefs on Whether False Statements Must be "Material" to Constitute an Aggravated Felony "Involving Deceit"
On November 10, 2015, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) invited interested members of the public to submit an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief discussing the following question: “In determining whether an offense constitutes an aggravated felony under section 101(a)(43)(M)(i)...
by Alexander Segal