Ottsville Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Paul M. Aaroe

✓ VERIFIED

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Felony, Traffic, Misdemeanor

New Jersey Bar 1998 PA Bar 1992

Paul M. Aaroe, II, Esquire. Over 30 years of experience. Personal and professional services. Son of Superior Court Judge Paul Aaroe. Dedicated ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-922-6730

2568 Nazareth Rd, Easton, PA 18045

Zak Taylor Goldstein

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Philadelphia Criminal Defense Attorney

Zak Goldstein is a Philadelphia criminal defense and civil rights attorney. Zak Goldstein has experience trying hundreds of cases before judges and ju... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-356-3201

1717 Arch Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Richard John Fuschino

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Felony, White Collar Crime, Federal Trial Practice, Federal Appellate Practice

Protecting Your Freedom and Your Reputation

If you are facing criminal charges in the Pennsylvania state or federal courts, you want a law firm with the experience, guts and the dedication to fi... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-951-3481

1600 Locust St, Philadelphia, PA 19103

Lauren A Wimmer

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Police Misconduct, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI

Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

Attorney Lauren A. Wimmer has represented individuals charged in both state and federal court with charges ranging from misdemeanors like drug and var... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-417-0320

505 South Street, Philadelphia, PA 19147

Christopher Bokas

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Car Accident, Wrongful Death, DUI-DWI, Felony

Attorney Christopher Bokas handles all felonies and misdemeanors, including white collar crimes, juvenile crimes, drug offenses, parol and probation v... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-997-6550

20 West Third Street, Media, PA 19063

Michael J. Reed

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Felony, Personal Injury, Civil & Human Rights

Michael Reed practices law in Pennsylvania. He attended Villanova Law and have practiced for more than 25 years in Chester County. The cases have been... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

610-647-6777

1 City Hall Pl, Coatesville, PA 19320

Robert Charles Patterson

White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

434 Cattell Street, Easton, PA 18042

Arik T. Benari

DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

200 West Front Street, Media, PA 19063

Steve Edward Jarmon

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

24 E. Market Street, West Chester, PA 19381

Eric D. Strand

DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

27 S. Darlington St., West Chester, PA 19382

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BAILOR

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in or... (more...)

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in order to get it fixed would be a bailor.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

... The primary issue raised is whether Respondent's felony convictions for fraudulently procuring a credit card constitute "infamous crimes" for purposes of Article II, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which prohibits anyone convicted of such an offense from holding an ...

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

... [4] Appellant asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in grading forgery of a money order as a second-degree felony. We hold Appellant's negotiation of a counterfeit United States Postal Service money order constituted ...

Commonwealth v. Graham

... The suppression court did not err. Â¶ 7 Appellant next argues the court erred by grading the burglary charge as a felony of the first degree because the structure at issue was not ... (c) Grading.â€”. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), burglary is a felony of the first degree. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Ottsville Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Paul M. Aaroe

Zak Taylor Goldstein

Richard John Fuschino

Lauren A Wimmer

Christopher Bokas

Michael J. Reed

Robert Charles Patterson

Arik T. Benari

Steve Edward Jarmon

Eric D. Strand

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HABEAS CORPUS

BURDEN OF PROOF

ACQUITTAL

NOLLE PROSEQUI

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BAILOR

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

Commonwealth v. Graham

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details