Oxford Juvenile Law Lawyer, Maryland

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Crawford, Jr.
About | Practice Areas
James E. Crawford, Jr. & Associates, LLC
999 Corporate Blvd. Suite 100 Linthicum, MD 21090» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
Move Forward With Confidence

Our Firm's team of family, criminal, and business lawyers understand that each case presents unique challenges and must be met with equally unique approaches.

800-789-9220
1. James Crawford, Jr. Linthicum, MD
  Attorney at Law - MD, 1992
  University of Baltimore J.D. 1992
2. AboutJames E. Crawford, Jr. & Associates, LLC
  When you need us, we're there.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Karen Reisinger Ketterman

Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

108 W. Dover Street, Easton, MD 21601

Jamie Erin Adkins

Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

11 N. Washington Street, Easton, MD 21601

Sarah H Ramsey

Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Oxford, MD 21654

Sandy Brown

Dispute Resolution, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

8 S. West Street, Easton, MD 21601

Hon Jamie Erin Adkins

Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

11 N Washington St, Easton, MD 21601

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re James G.

... A master for juvenile causes held a six-month review hearing on May 16, 2006. ... (Emphasis added.). On the day of the hearing, February 23, 2007, the juvenile master submitted a recommended order to the court. It summarized the hearing testimony, and stated: ...

Hess v. DEPT. OF JUVENILE SERVICES

The crux of the parties' variously worded questions presented is whether the ALJ committed legal error in the manner in which he defined the breadth of the provision in COMAR 17.04.11.02B(1)(e), which renders time away from the work place compensable where ...

In re Julianna B.

... HOLLANDER, Judge. The Circuit Court for Montgomery County, sitting as a juvenile court, found Julianna B., appellant, delinquent, based on its determination that she committed second-degree murder and related offenses. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Oxford Juvenile Law Lawyer, Maryland

Sponsored Law Firm

James E. Crawford, Jr. & Associates, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Karen Reisinger Ketterman

Jamie Erin Adkins

Sarah H Ramsey

Sandy Brown

Hon Jamie Erin Adkins

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL CASE

SPECIFIC INTENT

BATTERY

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

LINEUP

BURDEN OF PROOF

INTENTIONAL TORT

HABEAS CORPUS

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re James G.

Hess v. DEPT. OF JUVENILE SERVICES

In re Julianna B.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details