Plano DUI-DWI Lawyer, Iowa

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Thomas Viner
About | Practice Areas
Viner Law Firm PC
228 2nd St SE The Granby Building Cedar Rapids, IA 52401» view map
Criminal Defense
An Attorney Who Will Put Your Needs First

We understand that bad things happen in the lives of good people, so we will listen to your story, gather the facts and represent you with the personal attention you deserve.

800-797-9191
1. Thomas Viner Cedar Rapids, IA
  Attorney at Law - IA, 2005
  Drake University J.D. 2004
2. AboutViner Law Firm PC
  Over 10 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Plano DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Plano Criminal lawyers.

Philip K. Ferren

Criminal, Collection, Contract, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

Centerville, IA 52544

Diane G. Crookham - Johnson

Criminal, Administrative Law, Adoption, Education

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

108 1St Ave E, Oskaloosa, IA 52577

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Dailey

... Jennifer L. Tampoya, What Works, What Doesn't: Revising DUI Laws in West Virginia to Reduce Recidivism and Save Lives, 111 W. Va. ... [4] Angela Carlisle, Staggered Sentencing for Repeat DWI Offenders: A New Weapon in the War Against Drunk Driving, 25 Hamline J. Pub. ...

State v. Dailey

State v. Myers

... Beckman, 944 P.2d at 759. Thus, the defendant maintained his 1983, 1987, and 1988 driving under the influence convictions were all eligible for expunction because after 1988 he went five years without a DUI conviction. Id. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Plano DUI-DWI Lawyer, Iowa

Sponsored Law Firm

Viner Law Firm PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Philip K. Ferren

Diane G. Crookham - Johnson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BAILIFF

JURY NULLIFICATION

EAVESDROPPING

ACQUITTAL

MENS REA

SELF-DEFENSE

EXPUNGE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

VENIREMEN

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Dailey

State v. Dailey

State v. Myers

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details