Racine Traffic Lawyer, Wisconsin

Featured Lawyers

(advanced lawyer search)
Show:
Sort:Distance Name Location LAWPOINTS™

1-10 of 10 matches. Page 1 of 1.

LAWPOINTS 36
Robert W. Keller (3.0 miles)
Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Litigation, Criminal
913 S. Main St.,
Racine, WI 53403, Racine County
  Free Consultation
LAWPOINTS 57
Matthew Johnson (3.0 miles)
Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Juvenile Law, Traffic
913 Main Street,
Racine, WI 53403, Racine County
LAWPOINTS 49
Jay Nixon (3.0 miles)
Bankruptcy & Debt, Foreclosure, Criminal, Traffic, Estate
333 Main St.,
Racine, WI 53403, Racine County
  Free Consultation
LAWPOINTS 24
James J Ermert (1.1 miles)
Criminal, Traffic, Family Law, Real Estate, Wills & Probate
1661 Douglas Ave,
Racine, WI 53404, Racine County
LAWPOINTS 24
Joseph R. Reback (1.8 miles)
Criminal, Traffic, Family Law, Personal Injury, Bankruptcy
5200 Washington Ave,
Racine, WI 53406, Racine County
LAWPOINTS 24
Mark J. Leuck (2.7 miles)
Traffic, Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury, Military, Employment
6800 Washington Ave,
Racine, WI 53406, Racine County
LAWPOINTS 24
Christy M. Hall (3.0 miles)
Criminal, Traffic, Juvenile Law
Law Offices of Christy M. Hall, LLC, 601 Lake Avenue
Racine, WI 53403, Racine County
LAWPOINTS 24
Michael J. Masnica (9.0 miles)
Felony, Misdemeanor, Traffic
3505 30th Ave,
Kenosha, WI 53144, Kenosha County
LAWPOINTS 19
Thomas G. Richman (10.3 miles)
Traffic, DUI-DWI
150 E Fitzsimmons Rd,
Oak Creek, WI 53154, Milwaukee County
LAWPOINTS 14
John E Carter (1.6 miles)
Criminal, Business, Traffic, Family Law, Banking & Finance
524 S Main St,
Racine, WI 53403, Racine County

1-10 of 10 matches. Page 1 of 1.


We submit quality inquiries to local lawyers. You agree to the Consent to Receive Emails, Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Information on Legal Practice Sponsorships



Tips
Easily find Racine Traffic Lawyers and Racine Traffic Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Motor Vehicle areas including Defect and Lemon Law attorneys.

Sample WI Traffic Cases

... The defendant asserted that any evidence should be suppressed because the police officer had neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion to conduct the traffic stop. The defendant appealed the circuit court's decision, and the court of appeals reversed. ...

... The Supreme Court concluded that, because the driver was lawfully seized for a traffic violation, and because a dog sniff of the exterior of a vehicle did not constitute a search, the intrusion of the dog sniff did not "rise to the level of a constitutionally cognizable infringement." Id. ...

... the road. ¶ 29 There was no other traffic; the roadway was dry and free of debris. Thus traffic and road conditions do not explain the defendant's driving. ¶ 30 Second, the officers' experience is a consideration. Officer Hoffman ...

... STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). [1] He contends evidence of his intoxication must be suppressed because police lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop. ... Danielson testified that on August 4, 1999, he was observing traffic on Interstate 94 in St. Croix County. ...

... According to Kramer, he had parked on the side of the road in order to make a phone call, and had activated his hazard lights because he was parked at the crest of a hill and was concerned about his visibility with respect to other traffic on the highway. ...

find a lawyer
Practice Area:

Where: (city, state, or zip)

Advanced Search