Reading Criminal Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Lee Ciccarelli
About | Practice Areas
Ciccarelli Law Offices
Numerous Office Locations AvailableÂ» view map
Criminal Defense
Success Is Our Mission

You gain the resources of a Team with 100 years of combined experience fighting for their clients throughout Pennsylvania.

888-240-0896
1. Lee Ciccarelli West Chester, PA
  Attorney at Law - PA, 1989
  George Washington University J.D. 1989
2. AboutCiccarelli Law Offices
  Passionate in what we do and compassionate with our clients.
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Angelo Leroy Cameron

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Personal Injury, Estate, Real Estate

Angelo graduated from St. Joseph’s University, Philadelphia PA, with a Bachelor of Science in Political Science, Latin American Studies and Economic... (more)

CONTACT

800-941-8911

725 Washington S, Reading, PA 19601

Curtis E. Barnes

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy & Debt, Estate

Located in the City of Reading, Berks County, Pennsylvania, Curtis E. Barnes is a skilled criminal defense attorney representing individuals charged w... (more)

CONTACT

800-781-9270

530 Walnut Street, Reading, PA 19601

Peter McHugh

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury, Immigration, Traffic

My name is Peter J. McHugh and for years I’ve been protecting the rights of people just like you — people whose reputations, livelihoods, and asse... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-628-0360

47 Marchwood Rd, Exton, PA 19341

William R. Bernhart

Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

537 Court Street, Reading, PA 19601

Howard M. Lightman

Corporate, Collection, Criminal, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1136 Penn Avenue, Reading, PA 19610

Daniel P. Emkey

Motor Vehicle, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Identity Theft

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

12 North 6th Street, Reading, PA 19601

David Schnarrs

Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

152 East High Street, Pottstown, PA 19464

Robert L. Sharpe

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2081 East High Street, Pottstown, PA 19464

David C. Najarian

Corporate, Criminal, Litigation, Personal Injury, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2970 Corporate Ct, Orefield, PA 18069

Andrea E. Mertz

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

645 Penn St, Reading, PA 19601

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

ACCESSORY

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An acces... (more...)

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An accessory is usually not physically present during the crime. For example, hiding a robber who is being sought by the police might make you an 'accessory after the fact' to a robbery. Compare accomplice.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... The Department suspended Licensee's operating privileges because of three criminal convictions arising from a single accident: reckless driving; failing to stop his vehicle at an accident scene where 168 death or personal injury was involved; and driving under the influence of ...

Com. v. Abraham

... 3 Abraham was charged with corruption of a minor, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 6301; indecent assault of a person less than 16 years of age, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 3126; endangering the welfare of a child, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 4304; and criminal solicitation, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 5902. ...

Com. v. Baldwin

... According to the Commonwealth, Section 9765 clearly indicates the legislature's intent that criminal defendants' sentences do not merge unless all of the elements of one offense are included within the elements of the other offense. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Reading Criminal Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Ciccarelli Law Offices

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Angelo Leroy Cameron

Curtis E. Barnes

Peter McHugh

William R. Bernhart

Howard M. Lightman

Daniel P. Emkey

David Schnarrs

Robert L. Sharpe

David C. Najarian

Andrea E. Mertz

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HABEAS CORPUS

ACCESSORY

SELF-DEFENSE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

INFRACTION

INTERROGATION

EAVESDROPPING

JURY NULLIFICATION

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Com. v. Abraham

Com. v. Baldwin

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details