Red Rock Juvenile Law Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

John Schill
About | Practice Areas
The Schill Law Group
8700 E VÃa de Ventura #210, Scottsdale, AZ 85258Â» view map
Criminal Defense, DUI-DWI
Criminal Lawyer

Have you been arrested for a crime? Criminal charges can have a negative effect on your reputation and future before you are convicted. Contact The Schill Law Group

480-525-8900
1. John Schill Phoenix, AZ
  Attorney at Law - Arizona, 1991
  Creighton University School of Law
2. AboutJohn Schill
  Mr. Schill is a client focused attorney with 25 years of criminal law experience.
3. Practice AreasServices
  Do not hesitate to hire a criminal attorney to fight your charges.
1. Contact
2. E-mail
3. Refer
4. Reviews
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Ruben P Esparza

Juvenile Law, Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Marana, AZ 85653

Ruben P Esparza

Juvenile Law, Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Marana, AZ 85653

Jessica Kristine Dixon

Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

Florence, AZ 85132

Darlyne V Gallaway

Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

5837 W Candleberry Way, Tucson, AZ 85742

DeLana Jacobs Fuller

Juvenile Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Florence, AZ 85132

DeLana Jacobs Fuller

Juvenile Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Florence, AZ 85132

Stefanie Chris Jones-Campbell

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal, Indians & Native Populations

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

Florence, AZ 85132

Nicole L Severson

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

Florence, AZ 85132

Cedric Martin Hopkins

Federal Appellate Practice, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

10645 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85737

James Soslowsky

Traffic, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1729 N Trekell Rd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

CONSTABLE

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep t... (more...)

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep the peace. Depending on the state, a constable may be similar to a marshal or sheriff.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

DENISE R. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC.

... OPINION. ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge. Â¶ 1 After Denise R. failed to appear for a December 2008 initial termination hearing, the juvenile court terminated her parental rights to her eleven-year-old son, Draven, and her six-year-old daughter, Larsen, based on findings that ...

In re Nickolas T.

... ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge. Â¶ 1 In this appeal, the State of Arizona challenges the juvenile court's order vacating its prior order that had required appellee Nickolas T. to register as a sex offender in connection with his 2003 delinquency adjudication for sexual assault. ...

In re Michelle G.

... 1 Michelle G. appeals from the juvenile court's January 2007 order that she pay restitution to the victim of criminal damage she had committed in 2004. She contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by ordering restitution after her disposition had become final. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Red Rock Juvenile Law Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

The Schill Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Ruben P Esparza

Ruben P Esparza

Jessica Kristine Dixon

Darlyne V Gallaway

DeLana Jacobs Fuller

DeLana Jacobs Fuller

Stefanie Chris Jones-Campbell

Nicole L Severson

Cedric Martin Hopkins

James Soslowsky

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HABEAS CORPUS

ARRAIGNMENT

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CONSTABLE

SELF-DEFENSE

CONTINGENCY FEE

JURY NULLIFICATION

DIRECTED VERDICT

PLEA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

DENISE R. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC.

In re Nickolas T.

In re Michelle G.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details