Richwood Felony Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

George Vahn
About | Practice Areas
Vahn Law
27 Dearborn Ave. #175 Browns Mills, NJ 08015» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Your Case Matters To Us

You have Rights; we exist to make certain those Rights are not violated and that you are afforded every opportunity to obtain a fair legal result.

800-708-3561
1. George Vahn Browns Mills, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 2005
  Rutgers University J.D. 2005
2. AboutVahn Law
  New Jersey's Legal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Christopher M Carnelli

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2091 Springdale Road, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003

Joseph J. Urban

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2091 Springdale Road, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003

Frederick W. Klepp

Military, Litigation, Wrongful Termination, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 58 Years

CONTACT

601 Longwood Avenue, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002

Stephen R. Piper

Domestic Violence & Neglect, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

212 W. Route 38, Moorestown, NJ 08057

Timothy Farrow

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

400 North Church Street, Moorestown, NJ 08057

Neal Rosenberg

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1155 Rte 73 North, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Walker

... This case implicates the four-prong statutory affirmative defense to felony murder, as set forth in NJSA 2C:11-3(a)(3)(a)-(d). Defendant Shem Walker was tried separately from codefendant Carl Trupaire on various charges arising out of the death of the victim, Albert Whitley. ...

State v. Whitaker

... Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). 184 Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. Defendant Quadir Whitaker was convicted of robbery and felony murder based on accomplice liability. The issue before the jury was ...

State v. Ingram

... Second, we determine whether the prosecutor misstated the applicability of the statutory affirmative defense to felony murder. ... Thus, in respect of defendant, the jury was left to deliberate only on one count each for conspiracy to commit robbery, robbery, felony murder and theft. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Richwood Felony Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

Vahn Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Christopher M Carnelli

Joseph J. Urban

Frederick W. Klepp

Stephen R. Piper

Timothy Farrow

Neal Rosenberg

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

JURY NULLIFICATION

SENTENCE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

NOLLE PROSEQUI

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

EAVESDROPPING

DIRECTED VERDICT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Walker

State v. Whitaker

State v. Ingram

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details