Ridgeland White Collar Crime Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Ridgeland White Collar Crime lawyer.
Below are all Ridgeland Criminal lawyers.

Mandy L. Caffee

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Guardianships & Conservatorships, DUI-DWI, Child Support

Mandy Caffee founded Caffee Law Office in Eau Claire with the goal of providing trusted local advocacy to the community. With the belief that everyone... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-925-8140

3409 Golf Rd, Eau Claire, WI 54701

Timothy J. O'Brien

Business, White Collar Crime, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

Menomonie, WI 54751

Stephen F. Muza

Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: Inactive Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

Menomonie, WI 54751

Ardis A. Cray

Criminal, Family Law, Estate Planning, Bankruptcy

Status: Inactive Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

12259 65Th Ave, Chippewa Falls, WI 54729

Jay E. Heit

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Mass Torts

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

116 W Grand Ave, Eau Claire, WI 54702

William F. Laman

Social Security, Criminal, Personal Injury, Mass Torts

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

118 East Grand Avenue, Eau Claire, WI 54701

Erika Bahnson

DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

1241 Menomonie St, Eau Claire, WI 54703

Brian Thomas Smestad

Juvenile Law, Employment, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1020 10Th Ave, Baldwin, WI 54002

Gary M King

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1241 Menomonie St, Eau Claire, WI 54703

Brian Howard Wright

Employment, Criminal, Litigation, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

116 West Grand Avenue, Eau Claire, WI 54702

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Ridgeland White Collar Crime Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mandy L. Caffee

Timothy J. O'Brien

Stephen F. Muza

Ardis A. Cray

Jay E. Heit

William F. Laman

Erika Bahnson

Brian Thomas Smestad

Gary M King

Brian Howard Wright

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

FEDERAL COURT

JUSTICE SYSTEM

LARCENY

PROSECUTOR

ACCOMPLICE

JURY NULLIFICATION

SPECIFIC INTENT

JURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details