Rolesville DUI-DWI Lawyer, North Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Karl Knudsen
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Karl E Knudsen
5 West Hargett Street Raleigh, NC 27601» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Providing Caring And Quality Repesentation

Karl E. Knudsen, is an experienced trial lawyer who believe the legal system is for everyone, not just the government or big companies.

800-264-5310
1. Karl Knudsen Raleigh, NC
  Attorney at Law- NC, 1978
  University of North Carolina School of Law, JD 1978
2. AboutLaw Offices of Karl E Knudsen
  BIG FIRM EXPERIENCE | SMALL FIRM ATTENTION
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Catherine Peebles

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic, Motor Vehicle, DUI-DWI, Divorce & Family Law

Catherine was raised in Northampton County, North Carolina. She attended North Carolina State University and later went to North Carolina Central Scho... (more)

CONTACT

800-938-8911

316 Fayetteville St, Raleigh, NC 27601

A. Patrick Roberts

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

203 W. Millbrook Road, Raleigh, NC 27609

Pat McNally

Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury, Workers' Compensation

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

500 N Arendell Ave, Zebulon, NC 27597

William Andrew Leliever

Deportation, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

5 West Hargett Street, Raleigh, NC 27601

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Maready

... That record reflected a total of six previous driving while impaired ("DWI") convictions. The Court of Appeals majority held it was not plain error to admit the entire driving record. 149 NCApp. ... Like the Goodman defendant, defendant here had six previous DWI convictions. ...

State v. Peele

... Defendant Lucian Jefferson Peele, Jr. appeals from his conviction for driving while impaired ("DWI"). ... The test recorded an alcohol concentration of.08, and defendant was issued a DWI citation. Defendant was found guilty of DWI in Martin County district court on 2 July 2007. ...

State v. Veazey

... On 1 January 2006, defendant Thomas Marland Veazey was charged with driving without a valid license and driving while impaired ("DWI") after being stopped at a driver's license checkpoint. Defendant was found guilty of DWI in district court and appealed to superior court. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Rolesville DUI-DWI Lawyer, North Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Karl E Knudsen

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Catherine Peebles

A. Patrick Roberts

Pat McNally

William Andrew Leliever

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

LARCENY

CAPITAL CASE

JURY NULLIFICATION

BURDEN OF PROOF

SEARCH WARRANT

MOTION IN LIMINE

INTENTIONAL TORT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Maready

State v. Peele

State v. Veazey

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details