Spojmie Ahmady Nasiri | Pleasanton Immigration Lawyer | California
Spojmie Nasiri, principal attorney, is a first generation immigrant herself who understands through personal experience how difficult and emotionally draining American immigration process can be. Mrs. Nasiri’s education, community involvement and associations reflect her outstanding dedication in the area of immigration law. She received her Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the University of California, Davis and her Juris Doctorate from Golden Gate University, School of Law. Mrs. Nasiri is a member of the California State Bar and is admitted to practice before the California Supreme Court and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Mrs. Nasiri currently practices immigration law exclusively and is an active member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
In addition to her practice, Mrs. Nasiri serves as a pro bono attorney with the Immigration Law Clinic at the University of California, Davis where she provides individual representation, pro bono referrals, and pro se materials to detained immigrants. She is also an avid volunteer at the Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Stanford University and provides legal services at the Afghan Coalition in Fremont, California and the Afghan community throughout the United States and worldwide.
Mrs. Nasiri has extensive experience with all types of immigration and deportation defense matters. She has conducted know-your-rights presentations on a variety of legal issues affecting immigrant groups at the West County Detention Center in Richmond, California and Yuba County Detention Facility in Marysville, California. She assists clients with a wide variety of immigration matters, including applications with the consulates and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, representing clients detained by the Department of Homeland Security, defending immigrants in removal proceedings in Immigration Court, and representing clients in criminal immigration proceedings in federal court. In addition to English, Mrs. Nasiri is fluent in Pashto and Farsi.
Lawyer.com Member Questionnaire
Please describe a case(s) in the last year or two where you made a big difference.
How did you build a successful practice?
What should clients look for in a lawyer?
How important is local knowledge to the success of your cases?
What information can you provide in a free phone consultation?
What information do you need in a free phone consultation?
What differentiates you from other lawyers in your community?
What is the most rewarding aspect of your job?
What are your other interests in addition to law?
Are you involved in your community?
Attorney is a member of of the following organizations:
American Immigration Lawyers Association
State Bar of California
Alameda County Bar Association
East Alameda County Bar Association
Contra Costa County Bar Association
Afghan American Bar Association Membership Committee
Bay Area Association of Muslim Lawyers
South Asian Bar Association
We Service Clients In:
San Francisco Bay Area • Nationally • Internationally • Alameda County • Contra Costa County • Santa Clara County • Marin County • San Francisco County • Santa Clara County • Solano County • Sonoma County • Sacramento County • Napa County • Yolo County • Yuba County • Stanislaus County
|Language:||Attorney and staff are fluent in Pashto, Farsi and Dari.|
|Learn More:||Lawyer Profile|
|Pleasanton Immigration Lawyer|
Are Medical Marijuana Cards a Defense to Criminal Charges in California?
A recent Rolling Stone article continues to point out the current administrations' "War on Pot" is very real and active.
by Riccardo Ippolito
Questioning the Deprivation of Sex Offender Rights and Opportunities
Across the United States, approximately 747,408 individuals are listed on sex offender registries.
by Riccardo Ippolito
Strip Searches Without Cause Upheld by Supreme Court
Various freedoms, this country is also known for many levels of protections from government overreach. Unfortunately, one of the basic levels of protection has been challenged by a recent Supreme Court ruling.
by Wendy Musielak