Stone Park Juvenile Law Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Darryl Goldberg
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Darryl A. Goldberg
33 N Dearborn St Suite 1830 Chicago, IL 60602» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Because Experience Matters

When a trial is in your future, make sure Chicago criminal defense attorney Darryl Goldberg is at your side. Defending your rights is the most important thing right now.

800-901-8970
1. Darryl Goldberg Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 2003
  Chicago-Kent College of Law J.D. 2003
2. AboutLaw Offices of Darryl A. Goldberg
  Because Experience Matters
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Brett A. Appelman

Criminal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law

Naperville, IL Criminal Defense Attorney

In 2007, Brett Appelman established Appelman Law LLC with the mission of safeguarding and advocating for the rights of individuals accused of crimes. ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

630-717-7801

50 S. Main St., Naperville, IL 60540

Philip R. Nathe

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law, Felony, Misdemeanor

DuPage County Criminal Defense Attorney

After starting his career in the criminal courts of DuPage County as a clerk more than 30 years ago, Philip Nathe went on to become an accomplished at... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

630-416-7600

552 South Washington St, Naperville, IL 60540

Patricia Magaña

Criminal, Juvenile Law, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Felony

Attorney Magaña has extensive experience in criminal defense, including traffic, misdemeanor, and felony offenses. Additionally, she represents indiv... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

630-448-2001

1555 Bond Street, Naperville, IL 60563

Marnie Michelle Slavin

Criminal, Real Estate, Traffic, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

240 E Lake Street, Addison, IL 60101

Miriam Robinson Stein

Education, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Banking & Finance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

4711 Golf Rd, Skokie, IL 60076

Christa Minnie Winthers

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1737 S. Naperville Rd., Wheaton, IL 60189

Carol Ann Richardson

Juvenile Law

Status: Retired Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

1071 W 15Th St, Chicago, IL 60608

Stephen Lowder

Elder Law, Juvenile Law, Wills, Commercial Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

10 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60603

Jennifer L. Hansen

Special Education, Nursing Home, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

555 Skokie Blvd, Northbrook, IL 60062

Sue Roberts-kurpis

Divorce & Family Law, Divorce, Juvenile Law, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3845 W 58Th Pl, Chicago, IL 60629

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski

... In declining to require registration, the respondent noted the minor was not afforded the right to a jury trial in this juvenile delinquency proceeding. ... The respondent further stated it is not appropriate to require registration without providing a juvenile the right to a jury trial. ...

In re Lakisha M.

... After a trial (705 ILCS 405/5-601 (West 2004)), a juvenile court found Lakisha guilty of committing the offense of aggravated battery, a Class 3 felony (720 ILCS 5/12-4(b)(3), (e) (West 2004)), [1] and adjudicated her delinquent. ...

People v. Coleman

... Defendant appeals, arguing (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for eliciting testimony from defendant regarding his prior juvenile conviction, and (2) the sentence for armed violence predicated on robbery as compared to the sentence for armed robbery with a firearm violates ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Stone Park Juvenile Law Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Darryl A. Goldberg

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brett A. Appelman

Philip R. Nathe

Patricia Magaña

Marnie Michelle Slavin

Miriam Robinson Stein

Christa Minnie Winthers

Carol Ann Richardson

Stephen Lowder

Jennifer L. Hansen

Sue Roberts-kurpis

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LINEUP

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

INTERROGATION

BAILIFF

IMPEACH

CORPUS DELECTI

ACQUITTAL

BURDEN OF PROOF

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski

In re Lakisha M.

People v. Coleman

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details