Stonington Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Andrew Amendola
About | Practice Areas
Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law
591 Thompson Avenue East Haven, CT 06512» view map
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate
Where Every Client Matters

Let Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law handle all your legal needs today@

800-942-4780
1. Andrew Amendola East Haven, CT
  Attorney at Law, CT
2. AboutAndrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law
  Where Every Client Matters
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Walter C Bansley

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

317 Long Hill Rd, Groton, CT 06340

Michael A. Blanchard

Criminal, Misdemeanor, Family Law, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

75 State Street, New London, CT 06320

Judie Lynn Marshall

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

317 Long Hill Rd, Groton, CT 06340

Jennifer Smith

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

317 Long Hill Rd, Groton, CT 06340

Laura Share

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

317 Long Hill Rd, Groton, CT 06340

Daniel Wade Luckett

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

317 Long Hill Rd, Groton, CT 06340

Donald Fitzgerald Meehan

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

317 Long Hill Rd, Groton, CT 06340

Robert Forrester Kappes

Insurance, Criminal, Transportation & Shipping, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

300 State St, New London, CT 06320

Walter C. Bansley

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: Suspended Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

317 Long Hill Rd, Groton, CT 06340

Bonde Johnson

Personal Injury, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Po Box 1774, Pawcatuck, CT 06379

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

... to 2003) Â§ 54-251 and General Statutes Â§ 54-257. After a hearing, the trial court found that, because the defendant had failed to register as a sex offender, he had violated the condition of his probation that required him to not violate any criminal law. ...

State v. DeJesus

... we will maintain the liberal standard, but do so as a limited exception to the prohibition on the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence in sexual assault cases to prove that the defendant had a propensity to engage in aberrant and compulsive criminal sexual behavior. ...

State v. Salamon

... In accordance with these principles, we have not hesitated to revisit and overrule our prior holdings, including prior holdings applicable to criminal matters; see, eg, State v. Skakel, supra, at 693, 888 A.2d 985; State v. Miranda, supra, at 733-34, 878 A.2d 1118; State v. Colon ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Stonington Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Walter C Bansley

Michael A. Blanchard

Judie Lynn Marshall

Jennifer Smith

Laura Share

Daniel Wade Luckett

Donald Fitzgerald Meehan

Robert Forrester Kappes

Walter C. Bansley

Bonde Johnson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ACTUS REUS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

FEDERAL COURT

CONVICTION

INTERROGATION

LINEUP

CAPITAL CASE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

State v. DeJesus

State v. Salamon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details