Vidal Lawyer, California

Featured Lawyers

(advanced lawyer search)
Show:
Sort:Distance Name Location LAWPOINTS™

1-4 of 4 matches. Page 1 of 1.

LAWPOINTS 14
Janet Murphy Heim (24.9 miles)
General Practice
Earp, CA 92242, SAN BERNARDINO County
LAWPOINTS 21
L Raymond Bower (40.8 miles)
General Practice
1940 Casa Linda St,
Needles, CA 92363, SAN BERNARDINO County
LAWPOINTS 9
Henry C Hopkins (36.1 miles)
General Practice
Parker Dam, CA 92267, SAN BERNARDINO County
LAWPOINTS 16
Aimee Lynn Grana (45.2 miles)
General Practice
25-300 Rice Rd,
Desert Center, CA 92239, RIVERSIDE County

1-4 of 4 matches. Page 1 of 1.





Tips
Lawyer.com makes finding Vidal Lawyers fast and easy. Refine your search for Vidal lawyers by legal practice area. Find a quality and affordable lawyer by reviewing detail profiles for Vidal attorneys. Many Lawyer.com featured Lawyers in California will offer free legal consultations and all have California law expertise.

Sample CA Cases

... 334 C. There Was No Probable Cause to Prosecute the Trademark Dilution Claim. (5) The trademark ... Act of 1995. We agree. 1. There is no legally tenable argument that Princess Diana used "Diana, Princess of Wales" as a trademark. ...

... result of caretaker absence. Allegation b-2 recited that, on March 8, 2009, father was involved in an automobile accident, with the three children in the car, while he was driving under the influence of alcohol. It further stated that ...

... Defendant Jesse Feyrer was charged with assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, an offense punishable either as a felony or a misdemeanor—commonly known as a "wobbler." It also was alleged defendant personally inflicted great bodily injury upon the ...

... That action was dismissed with prejudice. Then, after her husband's death from the lung cancer, plaintiff brought the current wrongful death action against defendant, again seeking compensation for the loss of her husband's companionship and affection. ...

... Code, §§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 264.1), forcible sexual penetration while acting in concert (id., §§ 289, subd. (a)(1), 264.1), and active participation in a criminal street gang (id., § 186.22, subd. (a)). The jury further found that the sex ...