Washington Depot White Collar Crime Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

John F. O'Brien
About | Practice Areas
Attorney John F. O'Brien
411 Center Street Manchester, CT 06040» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Affordable Criminal Defense

Attorney John F. O'Brien is an experienced criminal defense lawyer and trial lawyer. You don’t have to go through this alone, we are here to protect you and your rights!

60-290-9090
1. John F. O'Brien Manchester, CT
  Attorney at Law- CT, 1986
  Western New England University School of Law, J.D. 1986
2. AboutAttorney John F. O'Brien
  Affordable Criminal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jonathan J. Einhorn

Litigation, White Collar Crime, Criminal, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

129 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06510

Harold J Pickerstein

Tax, Banking & Finance, Litigation, White Collar Crime

Status: Retired Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

91 Lockwood Road, Fairfield, CT 06825

Kevin Randall Joiner

Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

2071 Park Street, Hartford, CT 06106

Hope C. Seeley

Civil Rights, White Collar Crime, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

51 Russ Street, Hartford, CT 06106

Jacob Hathorn

Tax, Class Action, White Collar Crime, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

185 Asylum Street, Hartford, CT 06103

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Washington Depot White Collar Crime Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

Attorney John F. O'Brien

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jonathan J. Einhorn

Harold J Pickerstein

Kevin Randall Joiner

Hope C. Seeley

Jacob Hathorn

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

BAIL BOND

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

ARREST

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

INTERROGATION

IMPEACH

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details