Washington Misdemeanor Lawyer, District of Columbia

Sponsored Law Firm


Robert Richard Castro Lawyer

Robert Richard Castro

VERIFIED
Accident & Injury, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Robert Richard Castro is an attorney currently serving the people of Washington, D.C. and Maryland. A partner in a firm in Waldorf, Maryland, he is pr... (more)

Mark Anthony Cotton Lawyer

Mark Anthony Cotton

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Estate, Accident & Injury

Mary  Paloger Lawyer

Mary Paloger

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Immigration, Business, Tax

Mary Paloger is a practicing lawyer in the states of District of Columbia and Maryland specializing in Divorce & Family Law. Mary Paloger received her... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

202-888-1736

David  Benowitz Lawyer

David Benowitz

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Federal, Traffic

David Benowitz is a criminal defense lawyer in Washington D.C. He has tried cases in federal crime, assault, fraud, and more. He is the only DC base... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

202-529-9374

Joseph Anthony Scrofano Lawyer

Joseph Anthony Scrofano

VERIFIED
Criminal, Traffic, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, Felony

Attorney Joseph A. Scrofano is a passionate trial lawyer who will aggressively fight for your rights in a DC criminal case. Mr. Scrofano has litigated... (more)

Shawn  Sukumar Lawyer
Shawn Sukumar
is a Top Attorney Award winner at Attorney.com. Only 5% have the elite qualifications. Click the badge for more info.

Shawn Sukumar

Shawn Sukumar is a Top Attorney Award winner at Attorney.com. Only 5% have the elite qualifications. Click the badge for more info.
VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Shawn Sukumar is a lawyer in Washington D.C. who focuses on criminal defense. Mr. Sukumar has also tried cases involving solicitation, drug offen... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

(202) 618-9898

Nabeel  Kibria Lawyer

Nabeel Kibria

VERIFIED
Criminal

Nabeel Kibria is a District of Columbia criminal defense and immigration attorney based in DC, with offices in both the District of Columbia and Alexa... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

202-689-4439

Seth Jay Price Lawyer

Seth Jay Price

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Immigration, Estate
Farral Ashley Haber Lawyer

Farral Ashley Haber

Criminal, RICO Act, White Collar Crime, Federal, Health Care

Farral Haber is a lawyer in Washington D.C. who focuses on white collar crimes. She has tried cases involving healthcare, fraud, embezzlement, a... (more)

Matthew  Wilson Lawyer

Matthew Wilson

Criminal

Matthew Wilson, Esq. knows how difficult it can be if you find yourself facing serious criminal charges or are targeted by a government investigation.... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

202-609-7885

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Washington Misdemeanor Lawyers and Washington Misdemeanor Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Criminal areas including DUI-DWI, Expungement, Felony, RICO Act, White Collar Crime, Traffic and Juvenile Law attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)
In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)
A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)
The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)
An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)
The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)
A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)
A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)
The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.