Weir Juvenile Law Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Robert Jones
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Robert R. Jones III
2411 Emancipation Ave, Suite 202, Houston, TX 77004Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Expert Representation for Reasonable Rates

If you need representation, call me 24/7.

800-883-8760
1. Robert Jones San Antonio, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 2014
  South Texas College of Law J.D. 2011
2. AboutLaw Office of Robert R. Jones III
  Call me 24/7--Reasonable Rates
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Douglas Neal Ranney

Juvenile Law, Other, Employee Rights, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Georgetown, TX 78627

Kenneth A. Crain

Juvenile Law, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

Georgetown, TX 78627

Leonard R. Morgan

Juvenile Law, Wills, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

706 S Morrow Street, Georgetown, TX 78626

G. Cole Spainhour

Juvenile Law, Wills, Family Law, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

405 Martin Luther King Jr St, Georgetown, TX 78626

Stephen Bradley Hesse

Other, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

405 Martin Luther King Jr St, Georgetown, TX 78626

Robert M. Phillips

Juvenile Law, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Georgetown, TX 78627

Steven C. Copenhaver

Juvenile Law, Clean Air Practice, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

207 S Austin Avenue, Georgetown, TX 78626

Kelley Francis Whalen

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Elder Law, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

611 S Church St, Georgetown, TX 78626

Ken Crain

Traffic, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1915 S Austin Ave, Georgetown, TX 78626

Lisa Darling Goddard-gikas

Civil Rights, Juvenile Law, Estate Planning, Family Law, Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

1801 Williams Dr, Georgetown, TX 78628

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Meadoux v. State

... [2]. On direct appeal, Meadoux argued, for the first time, that the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments contained in the Eighth Amendment barred the State from subjecting a juvenile capital offender to imprisonment for life without parole. ...

In re Hall

... In this original mandamus proceeding, we must decide whether an indigent person, adjudicated a juvenile delinquent as a minor and sentenced to forty years, has a 926 statutory right under the Juvenile Justice Code to the appointment of an attorney in a habeas corpus ...

In re FD

245 SW3d 110 (2008). In the Matter of FD, a Juvenile. No. 05-06-01712-CV. ... 112 Background. FD pleaded guilty in juvenile court to two counts of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. He was committed to TYC on September 10, 2003, when he was seventeen years old. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Weir Juvenile Law Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Robert R. Jones III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Douglas Neal Ranney

Kenneth A. Crain

Leonard R. Morgan

G. Cole Spainhour

Stephen Bradley Hesse

Robert M. Phillips

Steven C. Copenhaver

Kelley Francis Whalen

Ken Crain

Lisa Darling Goddard-gikas

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

PLEA

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

LINEUP

HOMICIDE

FEDERAL COURT

SPECIFIC INTENT

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Meadoux v. State

In re Hall

In re FD

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details