Woodbury Juvenile Law Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Andrew Amendola
About | Practice Areas
Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law
591 Thompson Avenue East Haven, CT 06512» view map
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate
Where Every Client Matters

Let Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law handle all your legal needs today@

800-942-4780
1. Andrew Amendola East Haven, CT
  Attorney at Law, CT
2. AboutAndrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law
  Where Every Client Matters
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Valerie C Ferrucci

Commercial Real Estate, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

216 Davis Street, Oakville, CT 06779

Kristen Wolf

Juvenile Law, Estate, Divorce, Child Support

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3190 Whitney Ave, Hamden, CT 06518

Robert Johnson Moore

Juvenile Law, Estate, Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

31 Thomas Street, New Haven, CT 06514

Haley W Schaefer

Juvenile Law, Wrongful Termination, Criminal, Consumer Protection

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3190 Whitney Ave, Hamden, CT 06518

Robert Moore

Juvenile Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

31 Thomas St, New Haven, CT 06514

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Allen

... persons under the age of eighteen differ from adults in terms of their culpability and moral responsibility, necessarily dictates a similar result because a life sentence without the possibility of release excludes the possibility of rehabilitation, the main objective for juvenile offenders ...

State v. Fernandes

... of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of assault in the second degree as an accessory in violation of General Statutes Â§Â§ 53a-8 and 53a-60(a)(1). The sole issue on appeal is whether the transfer of the defendant's case from the docket for juvenile matters to the ...

State v. Fernandes

... after a jury trial, convicting the defendant, David A. Fernandes, Jr., of one count of assault in the second degree as an accessory, a class D felony, in violation of General Statutes Â§Â§ 53a-8 (a) [1] and 53a-60 (a)(1) [2] following the transfer of his case from the juvenile docket to the ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Woodbury Juvenile Law Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Valerie C Ferrucci

Kristen Wolf

Robert Johnson Moore

Haley W Schaefer

Robert Moore

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

INTERROGATION

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

BURDEN OF PROOF

BAIL

HUNG JURY

IMPEACH

ACTUS REUS

INTENTIONAL TORT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Allen

State v. Fernandes

State v. Fernandes

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details