Exceptions to Limited Tort Insurance Coverage in Pennsylvania

by David J. Puzak on Mar. 10, 2023

Accident & Injury Accident & Injury  Personal Injury Accident & Injury  Car Accident 

Summary: In some cases, injured Pennsylvania drivers bound by the limitations of a "Limited Tort" policy can still bring claims as though they have Full Tort protection. This article explains the several "exceptions" to Limited Tort, including the "serious injury" exception that is often utilized.

Exceptions to Limited Tort Insurance Coverage in Pennsylvania

By David J. Puzak, Esquire

Puzak Law Offices, LLC


                If you have read our previous article titled: “Differences in Full Tort and Limited Tort Auto Insurance in Pennsylvania,” this article may be helpful as well.

Pennsylvania law recognizes several exceptions to Limited Tort coverage. Under these exceptions, the victim can seek full damages caused by the party at fault, including pain and suffering. In other words, they are not restricted by the limited rights of their Limited Tort policy.

                The Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Responsibility Law explains the Limited Tort exceptions, but we’ll set them out briefly here as follows:

1) Injured while on a motorcycle.

2) A drunk driver caused the accident. That driver must be convicted of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) or accepted into an Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) program.

3) The driver who caused the accident was operating a vehicle registered in another state.

4) Anyone injured while riding in a commercial vehicle, such as a being a passenger on a bus, truck, taxi.

5) The driver who caused the accident did not have auto insurance.

6) The “Serious Injury” exception. The restrictions of Limited Tort coverage will not apply if a victim is deemed to have suffered “serious” injuries. Other than in cases of scarring, disfigurement or death, proving that an injury is serious enough to reach this threshold can be challenging.

More About the “Serious Injury” Exception to Pennsylvania Limited Tort

                Many times people suffer injuries that require months of medical care, even though the accident was relatively minor. Anyone suffering months of rehabilitation and therapy would believe that their injuries are “serious”. However, Pennsylvania courts have not always agreed. Even long-term suffering and treatment may not always qualify. This is probably because there is no clear definition just what constitutes a “serious” injury for Limited Tort exception purposes.

                To meet the “serious injury” threshold an injured party is required to prove that they have suffered a serious impairment to a significant bodily function. In plain language, this means proving that their injuries have placed significant restrictions on their daily life.

                In the case of Washington v. Baxter our Pennsylvania Supreme Court enumerated the factors that a Court may consider when making a “serious injury” determination. The Court stated that the injury need not be permanent, but the extent of impairment, the particular body function impaired, the  length of time the impairment lasts, the treatment required to correct the impairment, and other  relevant factors may be considered.


                Unfortunately, there is even more bad news for drivers bound by the provisions of a Limited Tort policy. Our Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the “exceptions” to Limited Tort (above) do not apply to claims under the Uninsured or Underinsured provisions of your own policy. The case is: Rump v. Aetna Casualty, 710 A.2d 1093 (Pa. 1998).

                Uninsured or Underinsured coverage can be purchased for a slight increase in the premium. This gives the driver additional protection when an uninsured driver injures them. Being injured in a “hit and run” accident is a good example. However, if you have paid for these extra coverages – and have chosen Limited Tort coverage – the exceptions to limited tort do not apply.   

                Here is a practical example: You have chosen the Limited Tort Option, and also carry $100,000 in Uninsured Motorist coverage.  You are rear-ended by an uninsured driver, who is later convicted of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) at the time of the crash. Ordinarily the drunk driver exception to Limited Tort would apply. However, even though you paid for Uninsured Motorist coverage, you may not be able to collect against it, because of your Limited Tort selection. Of course you can still bring an action against the drunk driver, and hope that they have adequate insurance coverage.

                For more information please read our article: “Differences in Full Tort and Limited Tort Auto Insurance in Pennsylvania”.

Free Consultation – Call Us Now

                If you or a loved one has been injured, call us now for a free consultation. With over 20 years of experience in serious injury and wrongful death cases, we have probably seen a situation like yours before. Your consultation is free – and we never charge any fee unless we obtain a money recovery for you. Call 1-800-755-0245 or send an instant message through our website: http://www.puzaklaw.com. We look forward to helping you.

IMPORTANT: Every case is unique in its facts and circumstances. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended as legal advice for any particular case. We recommend consultation with a lawyer of your choice who can perform a thorough analysis of your situation and the particular rights and remedies that may apply. 


©David J. Puzak, Puzak Law Offices, LLC


Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.