Clatskanie Criminal Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jennie Clark
About | Practice Areas
Clark Law & Associates LLC
6501 SW Macadam Ave Suite E Portland, OR 97239» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Best Representation Possible

The advantage of having five attorneys and legal assistants is that we regularly confer with each other, so you receive the best representation possible.

800-722-8790
1. Jennie Clark Portland, OR
  Attorney at Law - OR, 2000
  University of California J.D. 1997
2. AboutClark Law & Associates LLC
  Best Representation Possible
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Leonard Charles Ostrow

Child Support, Criminal, Farms, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1323 Ne Orenco Station Pkwy, Hillsboro, OR 97124

Dawn M Mcintosh

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

Seaside, OR 97138

Tatjana Taubert Queener

Education, Criminal, Civil Rights, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

427 S Holladay Dr, Seaside, OR 97138

Thomas Alexander Campbell

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

Manzanita, OR 97130

Virginia Petersen

Traffic, Private Judging, Municipal, Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Forest Grove, OR 97116

Edward A Kroll

Accident & Injury, Employment, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

6125 Ne Cornell Road, Hillsboro, OR 97124

Ryan Robert Corbridge

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

Tanasbourne Drive, Hillsboro, OR 97124

Matthew David Mills

DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

Cornelius, OR 97113

Mario Sanchez

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

452 Ne 3Rd Ave, Beaverton, OR 97124

Oscar Garcia

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

230 Ne 2Nd Avenue, Hillsboro, OR 97124

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Rodriguez/Buck

... [9]. 3. Criminal History and Recidivism. A third factor that this court often has considered in proportionality cases is the defendant's criminal history. ... It is another indication that Measure 11 sentences in these cases would be disproportionate to the offense. 3. Criminal History. ...

State v. Rodgers

... stop was unlawfully extended when Van Arsdall had everything he needed to issue a citation for the burned-out license plate light and, instead of doing so, questioned defendant about the containers without reasonable suspicion that defendant had engaged in criminal activity. ...

State v. Lennon

... Based on the seriousness of his current offense and the existence of two person-related felony convictions in his criminal history, the presumptive sentence for defendant's offense under the sentencing guidelines was 35 to 40 months of incarceration. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Clatskanie Criminal Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

Clark Law & Associates LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Leonard Charles Ostrow

Dawn M Mcintosh

Tatjana Taubert Queener

Thomas Alexander Campbell

Virginia Petersen

Edward A Kroll

Ryan Robert Corbridge

Matthew David Mills

Mario Sanchez

Oscar Garcia

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

ARREST

SELF-DEFENSE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

SPECIFIC INTENT

BATTERY

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

PROSECUTOR

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Rodriguez/Buck

State v. Rodgers

State v. Lennon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details