Columbiana Juvenile Law Lawyer, Alabama

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jay Stoves
About | Practice Areas
The Stoves Law Firm, P.C.
9 Office Park Cir Suite 105 Birmingham, AL 35223» view map
Criminal Defense
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

The Stoves Law Firm, P.C. provides outstanding Criminal Defense and Litigation services to individuals and businesses throughout the State of Alabama.

800-818-9390
1. Jay Stoves Birmingham, AL
  Attorney at Law - AL, 1997
  Birmingham School of Law J.D.
2. AboutThe Stoves Law Firm, P.C.
  Get on the path to results today.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Richard Carl Perry

Juvenile Law, Municipal, Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

13521 Old Highway 280, Birmingham, AL 35242

James R. Gillis

Juvenile Law, Wills, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2301 Morris Ave, Birmingham, AL 35203

James Robert Gillis

Juvenile Law, Wills, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2301 Morris Ave, Birmingham, AL 35203

Wendy Allison Reese

Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

100 Chase Park South, Birmingham, AL 35244

David Russell Blount

Power of Attorney, Education, Guardianships & Conservatorships, Juvenile Law, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

7127 Gadsden Hwy, Trussville, AL 35173

John Louis Bodie

Juvenile Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Trussville, AL 35173

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

WBGM v. PST

... Procedural History. The parties were never married, and, in 2001, the mother filed a child-support action in the Morgan Juvenile Court ("the juvenile court"). On January 29, 2001, the juvenile court exercised its jurisdiction by ...

Ex parte TC

... This mandamus proceeding was initiated by TC ("the father"), who is the primary custodial parent of AC and Tr.C. ("the children"); the father seeks review of, among other things, a "status quo" order entered by the Baldwin Juvenile Court in favor of the children's mother, CE ("the ...

KCG v. SJR

... MOORE, Judge. In January 2008, SJR ("the paternal grandmother") filed a petition seeking to have her grandchild, HAG ("the child"), declared dependent by the Baldwin Juvenile Court ("the juvenile court") and to have the child's legal custody awarded to her. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Columbiana Juvenile Law Lawyer, Alabama

Sponsored Law Firm

The Stoves Law Firm, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Richard Carl Perry

James R. Gillis

James Robert Gillis

Wendy Allison Reese

David Russell Blount

John Louis Bodie

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

IMPEACH

ASSAULT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SPECIFIC INTENT

CHARGE

ARRAIGNMENT

HUNG JURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

WBGM v. PST

Ex parte TC

KCG v. SJR

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details