Dallas Criminal Lawyer, Texas, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Andrew Howard
About | Practice Areas
Andrew V. Howard, PC
1717 Mckinney Ave Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75202» view map
Criminal
Experience You Can Trust

Attorney Andrew Howard is dedicated to protecting the rights of his clients and will stop at nothing to ensure they are treated fairly in court.

214-226-1848
1. Andrew Howard Dallas, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1995
  Regent University J.D. 1995
2. AboutAndrew V. Howard, PC
  Defending clients since 1995.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Howard M. Rosenstein

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Wrongful Termination, Accident & Injury

Job Discrimination/Wrongful Termination, Personal Injury, Civil Rights, All Criminal Law Cases

PAYMENT PLANS AVAILABLE Looking for an experienced Civil Rights Lawyer? This area of law can often be a complex and potentially confusing one, whic... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

817-781-6003

1309B W Abram St, Arlington, TX 76013

Phillip W. Galyen

Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Immigration

The law firm of Bailey & Galyen is one of the largest "consumer law firms" in the state of Texas with over 30 attorneys and 13 offices throughout Texa... (more)

CONTACT

800-667-3791

1901 Airport Fwy, Bedford, TX 76021

John Robinson

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Personal Injury, Mass Torts, DUI-DWI

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

855-982-7199

1901 Airport Freeway, Bedford, TX 76021

Darlina Crowder

Criminal, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Felony, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor

Attorney Darlina C. Crowder provides criminal defense representation for clients in the Plano, Texas area. She has been practicing law in the U.S. Dis... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-620-4770

7950 Legacy Drive, Plano, TX 75024

Hunter A. Biederman

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law

The “Go to Guy for DWIs”.

Hunter Biederman, often referred to as the “Go to Guy for DWIs” is a founding partner of the Law Offices of Biederman & Burleson P.L.L.C., located... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

469-333-3333

2591 Dallas Parkway, Frisco, TX 75034

Todd Rash

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Juvenile Law, Accident & Injury

94% Non-Conviction Rate; Less Than 2% Of Clients Served Jail Time

When you are facing a serious criminal charge, you need an experienced aggressive criminal defense attorney that delivers results. Todd Rash's record... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-698-5790

2363 Hwy. 287 N., Mansfield, TX 76063

Anthony Wayne Reed

✓ VERIFIED

Real Estate, Business, Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Our firm is lead by Anthony W. Reed, Esq. who is the Principal of The Reed Law Group, PLLC. Anthony is fluent in legalese, and a proficient negotiator... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-996-8670

3245 W Main St, Frisco, TX 75034

Jesse Munguia

✓ VERIFIED

Civil Rights, Juvenile Law, Estate Planning, Family Law, Employment

The Managing Attorney is Jesse Munguia. We are a full service law firm. We primarily service clients in Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support Modifica... (more)

CONTACT

800-975-8021

100 Chambers Circle, Waxahachie, TX 75165

Jack Gilbert Duffy

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury, Wills & Probate

Jack Duffy is an experienced and aggressive trial lawyer who has won many acquittals for clients in jury trials. He has represented clients throughout... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-936-9071

6220 Midway Rd, Haltom City, TX 76117

Robert Keating

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime

Attorney Rob Keating has successfully represented individuals charged with crimes ranging from serious felony offenses to minor municipal citations in... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

888-403-0383

777 Main Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DISCOVERY

A formal investigation -- governed by court rules -- that is conducted before trial. Discovery allows one party to question other parties, and sometimes witness... (more...)

A formal investigation -- governed by court rules -- that is conducted before trial. Discovery allows one party to question other parties, and sometimes witnesses. It also allows one party to force the others to produce requested documents or other physical evidence. The most common types of discovery are interrogatories, consisting of written questions the other party must answer under penalty of perjury, and depositions, which involve an in-person session at which one party to a lawsuit has the opportunity to ask oral questions of the other party or her witnesses under oath while a written transcript is made by a court reporter. Other types of pretrial discovery consist of written requests to produce documents and requests for admissions, by which one party asks the other to admit or deny key facts in the case. One major purpose of discovery is to assess the strength or weakness of an opponent's case, with the idea of opening settlement talks. Another is to gather information to use at trial. Discovery is also present in criminal cases, in which by law the prosecutor must turn over to the defense any witness statements and any evidence that might tend to exonerate the defendant. Depending on the rules of the court, the defendant may also be obliged to share evidence with the prosecutor.

INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE

Testimony or other evidence that fails to meet state or federal court rules governing the types of evidence that can be presented to a judge or jury. The main r... (more...)

Testimony or other evidence that fails to meet state or federal court rules governing the types of evidence that can be presented to a judge or jury. The main reason why evidence is ruled inadmissible is because it falls into a category deemed so unreliable that a court should not consider it as part of a deciding a case --for example, hearsay evidence, or an expert's opinion that is not based on facts generally accepted in the field. Evidence will also be declared inadmissible if it suffers from some other defect--for example, as compared to its value, it will take too long to present or risks enflaming the jury, as might be the case with graphic pictures of a homicide victim. In addition, in criminal cases, evidence that is gathered using illegal methods is commonly ruled inadmissible. Because the rules of evidence are so complicated (and because contesting lawyers waste so much time arguing over them) there is a strong trend towards using mediation or arbitration to resolve civil disputes. In mediation and arbitration, virtually all evidence can be considered. See evidence, admissible evidence.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

... III. Is Clewis Necessary to Address Some Widespread Criminal Justice Problem That Jackson v. Virginia Is Inadequate To Address. We agree ... review. II. A. Logic Requires a Single Standard of Sufficiency Review in Criminal Cases. I ...

In re Schulman

In re David SCHULMAN. No. AP-75,911. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 30, 2008. 404 John G. Jasuta, Austin, for Appellant. ... We filed and set this matter for consideration. II. A criminal defense attorney's duty is to zealously represent the interests of his client on appeal. ...

Laster v. State

... No. PD-1276-07. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 14, 2009. 515 Kim Campbell, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Kimberly Colliet Wesley, Assistant Criminal District Atty., Fort Worth, Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dallas Criminal Lawyer, Texas, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Andrew V. Howard, PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Howard M. Rosenstein

Phillip W. Galyen

John Robinson

Darlina Crowder

Hunter A. Biederman

Todd Rash

Anthony Wayne Reed

Jesse Munguia

Jack Gilbert Duffy

Robert Keating

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

JURY NULLIFICATION

DISCOVERY

INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE

PROBABLE CAUSE

MISTRIAL

INFORMATION

BURDEN OF PROOF

LINEUP

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

In re Schulman

Laster v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details