Elma Juvenile Law Lawyer, Iowa

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Thomas Viner
About | Practice Areas
Viner Law Firm PC
228 2nd St SE The Granby Building Cedar Rapids, IA 52401» view map
Criminal Defense
An Attorney Who Will Put Your Needs First

We understand that bad things happen in the lives of good people, so we will listen to your story, gather the facts and represent you with the personal attention you deserve.

800-797-9191
1. Thomas Viner Cedar Rapids, IA
  Attorney at Law - IA, 2005
  Drake University J.D. 2004
2. AboutViner Law Firm PC
  Over 10 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Elma Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Elma lawyers.

David Alexander Kuehner

Estate, Real Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

701 Blunt Parkway, Charles City, IA 50616

Ann M. Troge

Government, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

1208 Clark Street, Charles City, IA 50616

Barton Lyle Seebach

Litigation, State Government, Criminal, Elder Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

126 North Elm Street, Cresco, IA 52136

James D O'Connor

Commercial Real Estate, Immigration, Child Custody, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 65 Years

CONTACT

501 W Hamilton St, New Hampton, IA 50659

Alex Paul Koenigs

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

Cresco, IA 52136

Alfred A. Beardmore

General Practice

Status: Deceased

CONTACT

116 North Main Street, Charles City, IA 50616

Boyd G. Hayes

General Practice

Status: Deceased

CONTACT

100 Hulin Street, Charles City, IA 50616

Bradley David Sloter

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

200 North Johnson St, Charles City, IA 50616

C. Jane Anderson

General Practice

Status: Deceased Licensed: 74 Years

CONTACT

Cresco, IA 52136

C. John Anderson

General Practice

Status: Deceased Licensed: 74 Years

CONTACT

Cresco, IA 52136

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re PL

... Jessica Knoll, Sioux City, for mother. Marchelle Denker of Sioux City Juvenile Office, Sioux City, Guardian Ad Litem for minor child. ... WIGGINS, Justice. In this case, we must decide if the juvenile court was correct in terminating a father's parental rights. ...

In re DW

... CADY, Justice. In this case, the State requests further review of the court of appeals' decision reversing an order by the juvenile court terminating a mother's parental rights. ... As a result, we vacate the decision of the court of appeals and affirm the decision of the juvenile court. ...

State v. DIST. CT. FOR JOHNSON CTY.

... WIGGINS, Justice. The issue we must decide is whether the juvenile court can require the department of human services to pay the cost of detaining a juvenile in a detention center while waiting for placement in a group care residential treatment facility. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Elma Juvenile Law Lawyer, Iowa

Sponsored Law Firm

Viner Law Firm PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David Alexander Kuehner

Ann M. Troge

Barton Lyle Seebach

James D O'Connor

Alex Paul Koenigs

Alfred A. Beardmore

Boyd G. Hayes

Bradley David Sloter

C. Jane Anderson

C. John Anderson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

LINEUP

CIVIL

FEDERAL COURT

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re PL

In re DW

State v. DIST. CT. FOR JOHNSON CTY.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details