Harrisburg Juvenile Law Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory R. LaPapa
About | Practice Areas
LaPapa Law Group
10704 S Western Ave Chicago, IL 60643» view map
Accident & Injury Law, Criminal Defense
Changing Lives One Case At A Time

At LaPapa Law Group, we understand that life doesn’t always go as planned. We have the knowledge and experience needed to competently represent you in court.

800-694-2681
1. Gregory R. LaPapa Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 1982
  DePaul University J.D. 1982
2. AboutLaPapa Law Group
  We have been in practice for over 30 years.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law, Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Harrisburg Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Harrisburg lawyers.

Nina Brown

Municipal, Social Security, Wills & Probate, Estate, Government

Status: Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

15 E Poplar St, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Bruce Randolph Wissore

Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

300 S Mall St, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Michael Doerge

Workers' Compensation, Civil Rights, Insurance, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

108 E Walnut St, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Michal Doerge

Workers' Compensation, Civil Rights, Insurance, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

108 E Walnut St, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Kelly Ray Phelps

Workers' Compensation, Civil Rights, Business, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

108 E Walnut St, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Roman Patrick Kuppart

Government, Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury, Mesothelioma

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

3 S Main St, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Donald Ferrell

Construction Contracts, Employment, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

108 East Walnut Street, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Michael Scott Feist

Employment, Workers' Compensation

Status: Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

617 East Church, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Todd Patrick Bittle

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights, Collection

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

317 E. Poplar Street, Harrisburg, IL 62946

Pamela Murtaugh

Federal Appellate Practice, Workers' Compensation

Status: Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

300 Small St., Harrisburg, IL 62946

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski

... In declining to require registration, the respondent noted the minor was not afforded the right to a jury trial in this juvenile delinquency proceeding. ... The respondent further stated it is not appropriate to require registration without providing a juvenile the right to a jury trial. ...

In re Lakisha M.

... After a trial (705 ILCS 405/5-601 (West 2004)), a juvenile court found Lakisha guilty of committing the offense of aggravated battery, a Class 3 felony (720 ILCS 5/12-4(b)(3), (e) (West 2004)), [1] and adjudicated her delinquent. ...

People v. Coleman

... Defendant appeals, arguing (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for eliciting testimony from defendant regarding his prior juvenile conviction, and (2) the sentence for armed violence predicated on robbery as compared to the sentence for armed robbery with a firearm violates ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Harrisburg Juvenile Law Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

LaPapa Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Nina Brown

Bruce Randolph Wissore

Michael Doerge

Michal Doerge

Kelly Ray Phelps

Roman Patrick Kuppart

Donald Ferrell

Michael Scott Feist

Todd Patrick Bittle

Pamela Murtaugh

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PROSECUTE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

DIRECTED VERDICT

SPECIFIC INTENT

CRIMINAL INSANITY

INTENTIONAL TORT

SEARCH WARRANT

GRAND JURY

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski

In re Lakisha M.

People v. Coleman

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS