Hartford Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

John F. O'Brien
About | Practice Areas
Attorney John F. O'Brien
411 Center Street Manchester, CT 06040» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Affordable Criminal Defense

Attorney John F. O'Brien is an experienced criminal defense lawyer and trial lawyer. You don’t have to go through this alone, we are here to protect you and your rights!

60-290-9090
1. John F. O'Brien Manchester, CT
  Attorney at Law- CT, 1986
  Western New England University School of Law, J.D. 1986
2. AboutAttorney John F. O'Brien
  Affordable Criminal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Thomas J. Piscatelli

Family Law, Real Estate, Litigation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

520 South Main Street (Route 63), Naugatuck, CT 06770

Kim Coleman Waisonovitz

Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal, Employment Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Criminal Defense Attorneys, 649 Amity Road, Bethany, CT 06524

John F. Geida

Administrative Law, Civil Rights, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Criminal Defense Attorneys, 649 Amity Road, Bethany, CT 06524

John F. Riley

Real Estate, Litigation, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1960 Whitney Avenue, Hamden, CT 06517

Edward J. McManus

Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Accident & Injury, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1337 Dixwell Avenue, Hamden, CT 06514

Louis M. Rubano

Criminal, Constitutional Law, Products Liability, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

52 Trumbull Street, New Haven, CT 06510

Ira B. Grudberg

Litigation, Natural Resources, Criminal, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

350 Orange Street, New Haven, CT 06511

Anthony D. Sutton

Litigation, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

350 Orange Street, New Haven, CT 06511

Kevin M. Smith

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

129 Church Street, New Haven, CT 06510

V. James Ferraro

Business Organization, Criminal, Estate Planning, Government Agencies

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

205 Church Street, New Haven, CT 06510

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

... to 2003) Â§ 54-251 and General Statutes Â§ 54-257. After a hearing, the trial court found that, because the defendant had failed to register as a sex offender, he had violated the condition of his probation that required him to not violate any criminal law. ...

State v. DeJesus

... we will maintain the liberal standard, but do so as a limited exception to the prohibition on the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence in sexual assault cases to prove that the defendant had a propensity to engage in aberrant and compulsive criminal sexual behavior. ...

State v. Salamon

... In accordance with these principles, we have not hesitated to revisit and overrule our prior holdings, including prior holdings applicable to criminal matters; see, eg, State v. Skakel, supra, at 693, 888 A.2d 985; State v. Miranda, supra, at 733-34, 878 A.2d 1118; State v. Colon ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Hartford Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

Attorney John F. O'Brien

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Thomas J. Piscatelli

Kim Coleman Waisonovitz

John F. Geida

John F. Riley

Edward J. McManus

Louis M. Rubano

Ira B. Grudberg

Anthony D. Sutton

Kevin M. Smith

V. James Ferraro

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MOTION IN LIMINE

ARREST WARRANT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

ARRAIGNMENT

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

BURDEN OF PROOF

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

MENS REA

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

State v. DeJesus

State v. Salamon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details