Little Rock Misdemeanor Lawyer, Arkansas

Sponsored Law Firm


Matthew Porter McKay Lawyer

Matthew Porter McKay

VERIFIED
Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor
I defend the accused, innocent, or guilty. I handle felony and misdemeanor cases.

Like many of my clients, I was born and raised in Arkansas by a single mother. I went to high school, college and law school in Little Rock. While in ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-658-4570

Judson Candler Kidd Lawyer

Judson Candler Kidd

VERIFIED
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

I was exposed to law at an early age as my grandfather and father were trial lawyers, grandmother was a court reporter and my uncle was a US Marshall.... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-936-8091

Lisa Gail Douglas Lawyer

Lisa Gail Douglas

VERIFIED
Accident & Injury, Health Care, Social Security, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law
Focus of practice is injury, accidents and social security disability.

Talk to a Nurse/Attorney. Voted Best Attorney 4 consecutive years in the Stephens Media NLR Times Poll. Lisa Douglas has been licensed as a Register... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

501-798-0004

Pamela  Panasiuk Lawyer

Pamela Panasiuk

VERIFIED
Criminal, Accident & Injury, Social Security -- Disability, Traffic

Pamela Epperson Panasiuk provides aggressive, thorough and personalized representation to individuals accused of crimes. She will protect an accuser's... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-736-4460

Speak with Lawyer.com
Robert Alston Newcomb Lawyer

Robert Alston Newcomb

VERIFIED
Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Employment

Mr. Newcomb proudly represents clients in need of Criminal and Employment matters.

Valerie Lynne Goudie Lawyer

Valerie Lynne Goudie

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Estate, Civil & Human Rights

Valerie Palmedo-Goudie graduated from Auburn University in 1986 where she earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree. She graduated from Washington and Lee Scho... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-789-2281

William Price Feland Lawyer

William Price Feland

VERIFIED
Criminal, Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law

William Price Feland is a practicing lawyer in the state of Arkansas.

Christopher M. Nolen

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Criminal, White Collar Crime
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

David W. Kamps

Criminal, Litigation
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Laura Robertson

Farms, Child Support, Adoption, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Little Rock Misdemeanor Lawyers and Little Rock Misdemeanor Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Criminal areas including DUI-DWI, Felony, RICO Act, White Collar Crime and Traffic attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)
The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)
The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)
Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)
A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE

Testimony or other evidence that fails to meet state or federal court rules governing the types of evidence that can be presented to a judge or jury. The main r... (more...)
Testimony or other evidence that fails to meet state or federal court rules governing the types of evidence that can be presented to a judge or jury. The main reason why evidence is ruled inadmissible is because it falls into a category deemed so unreliable that a court should not consider it as part of a deciding a case --for example, hearsay evidence, or an expert's opinion that is not based on facts generally accepted in the field. Evidence will also be declared inadmissible if it suffers from some other defect--for example, as compared to its value, it will take too long to present or risks enflaming the jury, as might be the case with graphic pictures of a homicide victim. In addition, in criminal cases, evidence that is gathered using illegal methods is commonly ruled inadmissible. Because the rules of evidence are so complicated (and because contesting lawyers waste so much time arguing over them) there is a strong trend towards using mediation or arbitration to resolve civil disputes. In mediation and arbitration, virtually all evidence can be considered. See evidence, admissible evidence.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)
A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)
A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.